Skip to main content
Log in

Systems approach to reduce errors in surgery

  • Surgical errors section
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reducing the number of medical errors significantly is the challenge for the coming decade. In medicine and in surgery, in particular, errors are traditionally treated as being committed by individuals. To reduce human errors, two approaches can be used: the person approach and the systems approach. In the systems approach, the operator is not blamed, but the system is analyzed in order to find the causes of errors. Furthermore, defenses are built into the system so that errors will not result in an adverse outcome anymore. This article aims to provide insight into the systems approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albayrak A, Casseres YA, Schot C, Grimbergen CA, Bonjer HJ, Meijer D (2003) Quality assessment of light guide cables and endoscopes in Dutch hospitals. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 12: 179

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boer den KT, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ, Stassen HG (2002) Peroperative analysis of the surgical procedure. Surg Endosc 16: 492–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boer den KT, de Jong T, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ (2001) Problems with laparoscopic instruments. Opinion of experts. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techniques 11: 149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bogner MS (1994) Human error in medicine. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bogner MS (2003) Safety issues. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 12: 121–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Breedveld P, Stassen HG, Meijer DW, Jakimowicz JJ (1999) Manipulation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 9: 469–480

    Google Scholar 

  7. Calland JF, Guerlain S, Adams RB, Tribble CG, Foley E, Chekan EG (2002) A systems approach to surgical safety. Surg Endosc 16: 1005–1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Casseres YA, Albayrak A, Schot C, Grimbergen CA, Bonjer HJ, Meijer D (2003) The incidence of insulation failure of endoscopic instruments in Dutch hospitals. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 12: 178

    Google Scholar 

  9. Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (1994) Guidelines for preventing human error in process safety. Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York

  10. Cook RI, Woods DD (1994) Operating at the sharp end. In: Bogner MS (ed) Human error in medicine. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

  11. Cuschieri A (2003) Medical errors, incidents, accidents and violation. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 12: 111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Federal Aviation Administration (1995). Human performance considerations in the use and design of aircraft checklists. www.faa.gov/avr/afs/checklist.doc

  13. Federal Aviation Administration. The aviation safety system. www.faa.gov

  14. International Atomic Energy Agency (1991) Safety culture, Report 75-INSAG-4. International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group, Vienna

  15. Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1998) Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery—a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergonomics 29: 409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krueger GP (1994) Fatigue, performance, and medical error. In: Bogner MS (ed) Human error in medicine. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

  18. Leape LL (1994) Preventability of medical injury. In: Bogner MS (ed) Human error in medicine. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

  19. Moray N (1994) Error reduction as a systems problem. In: Bogner MS (ed) Human error in medicine. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

  20. National Patient Safety Foundation. www.NPSF.org

  21. Rasmussen J, (1983) Skill, rules and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinction in human performance models. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybernetics SMC 13: 257–266

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. Br Med J 30: 768–770

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ruchlin HS, Dubbs NL, Callahan MA (2004) The role of leadership in instilling a culture of safety: lessons from the literature. J Healthcare Management. 49: 47–58

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sjoerdsma W, Herder JL, Horward MJ, Jansen A, Bannenberg JJG, Grimbergen CA (1997) Force transmission of laparoscopic grasping instruments. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 6: 274–278

    Google Scholar 

  26. Townsend RN, Clark R, Ramenofsky ML, Diamond DL (1993) ATLS-based videotape trauma resuscitation review: education and outcome. J Trauma 34: 133–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Dankelman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dankelman, J., Grimbergen, C.A. Systems approach to reduce errors in surgery. Surg Endosc 19, 1017–1021 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-8109-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-8109-0

Keywords

Navigation