Skip to main content
Log in

A Method for Detecting Runs of Good and Bad Clinical Outcomes on Variable Life-Adjusted Display (VLAD) Charts

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years there has been a growing need for effective monitoring of clinical outcomes. Two techniques for continuous monitoring that have emerged almost simultaneously are the Variable Life-Adjusted Display (VLAD) and risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts (CUSUM). The VLAD provides clinicians and management with an easily understandable overview of outcome history and is now in routine use in several hospitals. Although it can indicate runs of good and bad outcomes, unlike the CUSUM, it does not provide a quantitative means for assessing whether they merit investigation. This paper introduces a scheme for applying control limits from CUSUM charts onto the VLAD, thus enhancing its role as an effective monitoring tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Aylin, N. Best, A. Bottle and C. Marshall, Following Shipman: A pilot system for monitoring mortality rates in primary care, Lancet 362 (2003) 485–491.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.A. Cook, S.H. Steiner, R.J. Cook, V.T. Farewell and A.P. Morton, Monitoring the evolutionary process of quality: Risk-adjusted charting to track outcomes in intensive care, Critical Care Medicine 31 (2003) 1676–1682.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.R. De Leval, K. François, C. Bull, W. Brawn and D. Spiegelhalter, Analysis of a cluster of surgical failures, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 107 (1994) 914–924.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W.E. Deming,The New Economics for Industry, Government and Education (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.F. Dorsch, R.A. Lawrance, R.J. Sapsford, J. Oldham, D.C. Greenwood, B.M. Jackson, C. Morrell, S.G. Ball, M.B. Robinson, A.S. Hall and for the EMMACE Study Group, A simple benchmark for evaluating quality of care of patients following acute myocardial infarction, Heart 86 (2000) 150–154.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O.A. Grigg, V.T. Farewell and D.J. Spiegelhalter, Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRT charts for monitoring in medical contexts, Statistical Methods in Medical Research 12 (2003) 147–170.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.M. Hawkins and D.H. Olwell,Cumulative Sum Charts and Charting for Quality Improvement (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B.E. Keogh and R. Kinsman,National Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report, 2000–2001 (Dendrite Clinical Systems Ltd., Henley-on-Thames, 2002).

  9. R.A. Lawrance, M.F. Dorsch, R.J. Sapsford, A.F. Mackintosh, D.C. Greenwood, B.M. Jackson, C. Morrell, M.B. Robinson, A.S. Hall and for the EMMACE Study Group, Use of cumulative mortality data in patients with acute myocardial infarction for early detection of variation in clinical practice: Observational study, British Medical Journal 323 (2001) 324–327.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Lovegrove, O. Valencia, T. Treasure, C. Sherlaw-Johnson and S. Gallivan, Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display, Lancet 350 (1997) 1128–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.P. Morton, M. Whitby, M-L. McLaws, A. Dobson, S. McElwain, D. Looke, J. Stackelroth and A. Sartor, The application of statistical process control charts to the detection and monitoring of hospital-acquired infections, Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice 21 (2001) 112-117.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G.V. Moustikades, Optimal stopping times for detecting changes in distributions, Annals of Statistics 14 (1986) 1379–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Pendleton and J. King, Values and leadership, British Medical Journal 325 (2002) 1352–1355.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Sherlaw-Johnson, J. Lovegrove, T. Treasure and S. Gallivan, Likely variations in perioperative mortality associated with cardiac surgery: When does high mortality reflect bad practice? Heart 84 (2000) 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Spiegelhalter, O. Grigg, R. Kinsman and T. Treasure, Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio tests: Applications to Bristol, Shipman and adult cardiac surgery, International Journal for Quality in Health Care 15 (2003) 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.H. Steiner, R.J. Cook, V.T. Farewell and T. Treasure, Monitoring surgical performance using risk adjusted cumulative sum charts, Biostatistics 1 (2000) 441–452.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry,Learning from Bristol. The Report of the Public Inquiry into Children’s Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995 (The Stationery Office, London, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Treasure, O. Valencia, C. Sherlaw-Johnson and S. Gallivan, Surgical performance measurement, Health Care Management Science 5 (2002) 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Sherlaw-Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherlaw-Johnson, C. A Method for Detecting Runs of Good and Bad Clinical Outcomes on Variable Life-Adjusted Display (VLAD) Charts. Health Care Manage Sci 8, 61–65 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-005-5217-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-005-5217-2

Keywords

Navigation