Skip to main content
Log in

Can Human Error Theory Explain Non-adherence?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To apply human error theory to explain non-adherence and examine how well it fits.

Method: Patients who were taking chronic medication were telephoned and asked whether they had been adhering to their medicine, and if not the reasons were explored and analysed according to a human error theory.

Results: Of 105 patients, 87 were contacted by telephone and they took part in the study. Forty-two recalled being non-adherent, 17 of them in the last 7days; 11 of the 42 were intentionally non-adherent. The errors could be described by human error theory, and it explained unintentional non-adherence well, however, the application of ‘rules’ was difficult when considering mistakes. The consideration of error producing conditions and latent failures also revealed useful contributing factors.

Conclusion. Human error theory offers a new and valuable way of understanding non-adherence, and could inform interventions. However, the theory needs further development to explain intentional non-adherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Barber (2002) ArticleTitleShould we consider non-compliance a medical error? Qual Saf Health Care 11 81–4 Occurrence Handle10.1136/qhc.11.1.81 Occurrence Handle12078377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Horne (1998) Adherence to medication: a review of existing research L Myers K Midence (Eds) Adherence to Treatment in Medical Conditions Harwood Academic Publishers London 285–310

    Google Scholar 

  3. I Ajzen M. Fishbein (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  4. H Leventhal M Diefenbach E. Leventhal (1992) ArticleTitleIllness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions Cognit Ther Res 16 143–63 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01173486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. JT Reason (1990) Human Error Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  6. N Barber J Parsons S Clifford R Darracott R. Horne (2004) ArticleTitlePatients’ problems with new medications for chronic conditions Qual Saf Health Care 13 172–5 Occurrence Handle10.1136/qshc.2003.005926 Occurrence Handle15175485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. RB Haynes HP McDonald AX. Garg (2002) ArticleTitleHelping patients follow prescribed treatment JAMA 288 2880–3 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.288.22.2880 Occurrence Handle12472330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Reason (2001) Understanding adverse events: the human factor C Vincent (Eds) Clinical Risk Management BMJ Books London 9–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Barber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barber, N., Safdar, A. & Franklin, B.D. Can Human Error Theory Explain Non-adherence?. Pharm World Sci 27, 300–304 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-005-0355-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-005-0355-7

Key words

Navigation