Abstract
Background
Traditional approaches to advance care planning (ACP) have many limitations; new approaches are being developed with the goal of improving end-of-life care.
Objective
To understand how the end-of-life care experiences of older patients and their caregivers can inform the development of new approaches to ACP.
Design
Qualitative cross-sectional study.
Participants
Caregivers of community-dwelling persons age ≥ 60 years who died with advanced cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or heart failure during follow-up in a longitudinal study.
Approach
In-depth interviews were conducted 6 months after the patient’s death with 64 caregivers. Interviews began with open-ended questions to encourage the caregiver to tell the story of the patient’s experiences at the end of life. Additional questions asked about how decisions were made, patient–caregiver, patient–clinician, and caregiver–clinician communication.
Main Results
Although the experiences recounted by caregivers were highly individual, several common themes emerged from the interviews. These included the following: 1) the lack of availability of treatment options for certain patients, prompting patients and caregivers to consider broader end-of-life issues, 2) changes in preferences at the very end of an illness, 3) variability in patient and caregiver desire for and readiness to hear information about the patient’s illness, and 4) difficulties with patient–caregiver communication.
Discussion
The experiences of older patients at the end of life and their caregivers support a form of ACP that includes a broader set of issues than treatment decision-making alone, recognizes the dynamic nature of preferences, and focuses on addressing barriers to patient–caregiver communication.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gillick MR. Advance care planning. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:7–8.
Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough. The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34:30–42.
Winzelberg GS, Hanson LC, Tulsky JA. Beyond autonomy: diversifying end-of-life decision-making approaches to serve patients and families. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1046–50.
Kolarik RC, Arnold RM, Fischer GS, Tulsky JA. Objectives for advance care planning. J Palliat Med. 2002;5:697–704.
Hickman SE, Hammes BJ, Moss AH, Tolle SW. Hope for the future: achieving the original intent of advance directives. Hastings Cent Rep. 2005;35:526–30.
Hanson LC, Danis M, Garrett J. What is wrong with end-of-life care? Opinions of bereaved family members. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:1339–44.
Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, Christakis NA, McIntyre LM, Tulsky JA. In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:825–32.
Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476–82.
Aronowitz RA, Asch DA. Cursing the darkness: are there limits to end-of-life research? J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:495–6.
Murphy DJ, Knaus WA, Lynn J. Study population in SUPPORT: patients (as defined by disease categories and mortality projections), surrogates, and physicians. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:11S–28S.
The Connecticut Hospice Inc. Summary Guidelines for Initiation of Advanced Care. Branford, CT: John Thompson Institute; 1996.
Fried TR, Byers AL, Gallo WT, et al. Prospective study of health status preferences and changes in preferences over time in older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:890–5.
Fried TR, Van Ness PH, Byers AL, Towle VR, O’Leary J, Dubin JA. Changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among older persons with advanced illness. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:495–501.
Fried TR, O’Leary J, Van Ness P, Fraenkel L. Inconsistency over time in the preferences of older persons with advanced illness for life-sustaining treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1007–14.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.
Ditto PH, Jacobson JA, Smucker WD, Danks JH, Fagerlin A. Context changes choices: a prospective study of the effects of hospitalization on life-sustaining treatment preferences. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:313–22.
Ubel PA, Loewenstein G, Schwarz N, Smith D. Misimagining the unimaginable: the disability paradox and health care decision making. Health Psychol. 2005;24:S57–62.
Straton JB, Wang NY, Meoni LA, et al. Physical functioning, depression, and preferences for treatment at the end of life: the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:577–82.
Fallowfield LJ, Jenkins VA, Beveridge HA. Truth may hurt but deceit hurts more: communication in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2002;16:297–303.
Cosgriff JA, Pisani M, Bradley EH, O’Leary JR, Fried TR. The association between treatment preferences and trajectories of care at the end-of-life. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1566–71.
Pantilat SZ, Steimle AE. Palliative care for patients with heart failure. JAMA. 2004;291:2476–82.
Rosenfeld KE, Wenger NS, Phillips RS, et al. Factors associated with change in resuscitation preference of seriously ill patients. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1558–64.
Kutner JS, Steiner JF, Corbett KK, Jahnigen DW, Barton PL. Information needs in terminal illness. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1341–52.
Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary J. Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1398–403.
Cherlin E, Fried T, Prigerson HG, Schulman-Green D, Johnson-Hurzeler R, Bradley EH. Communication between physicians and family caregivers about care at the end of life: when do discussions occur and what is said? J Palliat Med. 2005;8:1176–85.
Sudore RL, Schickedanz AD, Landefeld CS, et al Engagement in multiple steps of the advance care planning process: a descriptive study of diverse older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:1006-1013. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01701.x.
Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary JR, Byers AL. Unmet desire for caregiver-patient communication and increased caregiver burden. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:59–65.
Hinton J. How reliable are relatives’ retrospective reports of terminal illness? Patients and relatives’ accounts compared. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43:1229–36.
Addington-Hall J, McPherson C. After-death interviews with surrogates/bereaved family members: some issues of validity. J Pain Sympt Manage. 2001;22:784–90.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Carm Joncas, R.N. and Barbara Mendes, R.N. for their outstanding interview skills and Martha Oravetz, RN, for her assistance with coding of transcripts.
Supported by grant PCC 02–192 from VA HSR&D, R01 AG19769 from the National Institute on Aging, and a Paul Beeson Physician Faculty Scholars Award. Dr. Fried is supported by K24 AG28443from the National Institute on Aging.
Conflict of Interest Statement
None disclosed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Geriatrics Society. Supported by grant PCC 02–192 from VA HSR&D, R01 AG19769 from the National Institute on Aging, and a Paul Beeson Physician Faculty Scholars Award. Dr. Fried is supported by K24 AG28443from the National Institute on Aging.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fried, T.R., O’Leary, J.R. Using the Experiences of Bereaved Caregivers to Inform Patient- and Caregiver-centered Advance Care Planning. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 1602–1607 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0748-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0748-0