Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cognitive Errors and Logistical Breakdowns Contributing to Missed and Delayed Diagnoses of Breast and Colorectal Cancers: A Process Analysis of Closed Malpractice Claims

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

PURPOSE

To erform a process analysis of missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers to identify: (1) the cognitive and logistical factors that lead to these diagnostic errors, and (2) prevention strategies.

METHODS

Using 56 cases (43 breast, 13 colon) of missed and delayed diagnosis, we performed structured analyses to identify specific points in the diagnostic process in which errors occurred. Each error was classified as either a cognitive error or logistical breakdown. Finally, two physician-investigators identified strategies to prevent the errors in each case.

RESULTS

Virtually all cases involved one or more cognitive errors (53/56, 95 %) and approximately half (31/56, 55 %) involved logistical breakdowns. The clinical activity most prone to cognitive error was the selection of the diagnostic strategy, both during the office visit (25/56, 45 %) and during interpretation of test results (22/50, 44 %). Arrangement of follow-up visits with a primary care physician (8/29, 28 %) or specialist physician (7/29, 26 %) were especially prone to logistical breakdowns. Adherence to current clinical guidelines could have prevented at least one error in 66 % of cases and assistance from a patient advocate could have prevented at least one error in 48 % of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive errors and logistical breakdowns are common among missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers. Prevention strategies should focus on ensuring improving the effectiveness and use of clinical guidelines in the selection of diagnostic strategy, both during office visits and when interpreting test results. Tools to facilitate communication and to ensure that follow-up visits occur should also be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Risk Management Foundation. Reducing Office Practice Risks. Forum 2000;20(2).

  2. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Gawande AA, Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Yoon C et al. Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation. NEJM. 2006;354(19):2024–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandra A, Nundy S, Seabury SA. The growth of physician medical malpractice payments: Evidence from the national practitioner data bank. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;W5240–9.

  4. Phillips RLJ, Bartholomew LA, Dovey SM, Fryer GE J, Miyoshi TJ, Green LA. Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:121–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh H, Sethi S, Ruber M, Petersen LA. Errors in cancer diagnosis: current understanding and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(31):5009–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taplin SH, Rodgers AB. Toward improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty care. J National Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nekhlyudov L, Latosinsky S. The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diangosis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:11–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Brennan TA et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Int Med. 2006;145:488–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wachter RM. Why diagnostic errors don't get any respect—and what can be done about them. Health Affairs. 2010;29(9),1605–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kachalia A, Gandhi TK, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Thomas EJ, Griffrey R et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the emergency department: a study of closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(2):196–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Osherorff JA, Pifer EA, Sittig DF, Jenders RA, Teich JM. Clinical Decision Support Implementers' Workbook. Chicago: HIMSS, 2004.

  12. Weingart SN, Saadeh MG, Simchowitz B, Gandhi TK, Nekhlyudov L, Studdert DM et al. Process of care failures in breast cancer diagnosis. J Gen Int Med. 2009;24(6):702–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh H, Weingart SN. Diagnostic errors in ambulatory care: dimensions and preventive strategies. Adv Health Sci Edu. 2009;14(Supp 1):57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Poon EG, Wald J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Kuperman GJ, Gandhi TK. Supporting patient care beyond the clinical encounter: three informatics innovations from partners health care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003:1072.

  15. Gandhi TK. Fumbled hand-off: One dropped ball after another. Ann Int Med. 2005;142:352–358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1493–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Risk Management Foundation. Breast Care Management Algorithm. Risk Management Foundation, Cambridge, MA. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Risk Management Foundation. Colorectal Cancer Screening Algorithm. Risk Management Foundation, Cambridge, MA. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schiff GD. Minimizing diagnostic error: the importance of follow-up and feedback. Am J Med. 2008;121(5 suppl):S38-42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PC et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Murff HJ, Gandhi TK, Karson AS, Mort EA, Poon EG, Wang SJ et al. Primary care physician attitudes concerning follow-up of abnormal test results and decision support systems. Int J Med Inform. 2003;71(2–3):137–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23(2):116–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meaningful Use. healthit hhs gov [serial online] 2009.

  24. Singh H, Graber ML. Reducing diagnostic error through medical home-based primary care reform. JAMA. 2010;304(4):463–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Office of Inspector General, US Dept of Health and Human Services. Accountable Care Organizations. http://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/accountable-care-organizations/index.asp. 10-21-2011.

  26. Burstin HR, Johnson WG, Lipsitz SR, Brennan TA. Do the poor sue more? A case–control study of malpractice claims and socioeconomic status. JAMA. 1993;270(14):1697–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Studdert DM, Thomas EJ, Burstin HR, Zbar BI, Orav EJ, Brennan TA. Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado [see comments]. Med Care. 2000;38:250–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh H, Naik AD, Rao R, Petersen LA. Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: Harnessing the power of information technology. J Gen Int Med. 2008;23(4):489–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Contributors

No relevant contributors beyond the list of study co-authors.

Funders

This study was supported by grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS011886-03) and the Harvard Risk Management Foundation.

Prior Presentations

Material presented in this manuscript constitutes an original secondary analysis of a case series previously published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.4 An early version of the abstract was presented orally at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Conference.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric G. Poon MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poon, E.G., Kachalia, A., Puopolo, A.L. et al. Cognitive Errors and Logistical Breakdowns Contributing to Missed and Delayed Diagnoses of Breast and Colorectal Cancers: A Process Analysis of Closed Malpractice Claims. J GEN INTERN MED 27, 1416–1423 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2107-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2107-4

KEY WORDS

Navigation