Elsevier

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volume 58, Issue 6, December 1994, Pages 1866-1870
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Playing by the numbers: How collecting outcomes data changed my life

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(94)91729-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The Northern New England Cardiovascular Study Group has been using clinical epidemiology to analyze outcomes data in patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures to answer three questions: (1) for the surgeon: how am I doing?, (2) for the patient: what are my chances?, and (3) for society: can outcomes data be voluntarily collected and organized in a way to improve care delivery? The Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center cardiac surgery program has combined this regional outcomes data with the internal development of critical pathways; with evaluations of patient expectations, patient satisfaction, and patient functional health; and with innovative techniques of data display in an effort to improve the cardiac surgical outcomes in patients at the center. The length of stay has declined, and both the mortality rate and readmission rate have remained stable.

References (3)

  • GT O'Connor et al.

    A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting

    JAMA

    (1991)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline

    2007, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Most importantly, this requires active participation of all members of the health care team [661]. As an example, one successful set of innovative TQM studies was carried out by the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group [662–665]. These investigators used a risk-adjustment scheme to predict mortality in patients undergoing CABG at five different institutions.

  • Evidence-based surgery

    2006, Surgical Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    They have demonstrated shortened length of stay, reduced costs, and improved outcome with a judicious mix of their own risk-adjusted data and application of best evidence. All six units in the NNECVDSG have demonstrated benefits, and all have contributed to improved outcomes [24–26]. External drivers to push clinical practice toward a more standardized EBSP (perhaps the term “best practice” ought to be used) are principally three.

  • Cardiac surgery report cards: Comprehensive review and statistical critique

    2001, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the Alabama Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Cooperative Project [58], statewide unadjusted and risk-adjusted mortality for 1995 and 1996 varied from 2% to 12%. Risk-adjusted cardiac surgery databases continue to be used by institutions [74], cities [94], states [7, 26–60], regions [20–25], the Veterans Affairs Administration [61–67], and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons [68–73] for both academic and quality improvement purposes. Certain uses of such databases have been highly controversial.

  • Quantifying risk and assessing outcome in cardiac surgery

    1998, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the National Symposium on Using Outcomes Data to Improve Clinical Practice: Building on Models From Cardiac Surgery, Keystone, CO, June 6–7, 1994.

View full text