Elsevier

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volume 62, Issue 5, November 1996, Pages 1351-1359
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Original article: Cardiovascular
Applications of statistical quality control to cardiac surgery

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(96)00796-5Get rights and content

Background.

Although originally developed for use in manufacturing, statistical quality control techniques may be applicable to other frequently performed, standardized processes.

Methods.

We employed statistical quality control charts (X¯ — s, p, and u) to analyze perioperative morbidity and mortality and length of stay in 1,131 nonemergent, isolated, primary coronary bypass operations conducted within a 17-quarter time period.

Results.

The incidence of the most common adverse outcomes, including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and atrial fibrillation, appeared to follow the laws of statistical fluctuation and were in statistical control. Postoperative bleeding, leg-wound infection, and the summation of total and major complications were out of statistical control in the early quarters of the study period but showed progressive improvement, as did postoperative length of stay.

Conclusions.

The incidence of morbidity and mortality after primary, isolated, nonemergent coronary bypass operations may be described by standard models of statistical fluctuation. Statistical quality control may be a valuable method to analyze the variability of these adverse postoperative events over time, with the ultimate goal of reducing that variability and producing better outcomes.

References (13)

  • ShewhartWA

    Economic control of quality of manufactured product

    (1931)
  • ShewhartWA

    Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control

    (1939)
  • GrantEL et al.

    Statistical quality control

    (1988)
  • FeigenbaumAV

    Total quality control

    (1991)
  • BurrIW

    Statistical quality control methods

    (1976)
  • GitlowH et al.

    Tools and methods for the improvement of quality

    (1989)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (44)

  • Measuring and improving comprehensive pediatric cardiac care: Learning from continuous quality improvement methods and tools

    2018, Progress in Pediatric Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    When second order (special cause) variations are present, the goal shifts from decreasing variation to establishing control around a desirable outcome. Efforts to ensure effective participation of patients (and their families) in healthcare are called by many names —patient centeredness, patient engagement, patient experience [93]. Heart failure is a chronic illness that requires a co-production model to improve patient-centered outcomes [94].

  • Quality improvement methods to study and improve the process and outcomes of pediatric cardiac care

    2011, Progress in Pediatric Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    This control chart illustrates that the variation is due to common cause and that without any changes to the process they can predict time to extubation will continue to fall within a range that will not exceed the upper control limit of 55 h. Statistical control methodology cannot be applied to all surgical procedures, but is appropriate in the analysis of data from operations that are performed frequently and with relatively standard methods (by a small team) [20]. In addition, patients should be separable into homogeneous subsets for the analysis, for example by stratifying patients by procedure, and the procedures should have a well-characterized range of favorable and unfavorable outcomes.

  • Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: Part 2 - Implementation

    2011, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    An alternative is to order the display of confidence intervals alphabetically or randomly, with the population mean result superimposed. Some investigators have used a statistical quality control approach, with outlier “warnings” indicated by results outside the 95% or 2 standard deviation control limits, and confirmed outlier status designated when they lie outside the 99.7% or 3 standard deviation control limits [99]. Spiegelhalter [98] advocates the use of “funnel plots” that graph each provider's performance against its volume (Fig 2).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text