Elsevier

Applied Ergonomics

Volume 27, Issue 1, February 1996, Pages 39-44
Applied Ergonomics

Special issue paper
Designing better shift systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(95)00044-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The results of some intervention studies on the effects of the change from weekly rotating to quicker rotating shift systems are presented. Consequently, the following recommendations for the design of shift systems according to physiological, psychological and social criteria are discussed:

  • 1.

    (1) Nightwork should be reduced as much as possible. If this is not possible, quickly rotating shift systems are preferable to slowly rotating ones. Permanent nightwork does not seem to be recommendable for the majority of shiftworkers.

  • 2.

    (2) Extended workdays (9–12 hours) should only be contemplated when the nature of work and the workload are suitable for extended working hours, and the shift system is designed to minimize the accumulation of fatigue and toxic exposure is limited.

  • 3.

    (3) An early start for the morning shift should be avoided. Flexible working time arrangements can be achieved in all shift systems. The highest flexibility is possible in the so-called ‘time autonomous groups’.

  • 4.

    (4) Quick changeovers (e.g. from night shift to afternoon shift on the same day) should be avoided. The number of consecutive working days should be limited to five—seven. Every shift system should include some free weekends with at least two consecutive days off.

  • 5.

    (5) The forward rotation (phase delay, clockwise rotation: morning/evening/night shift) would seem to be most preferred.

References (34)

  • P. Knauth et al.

    Time-budget studies of policemen in weekly or swiftly rotating shift systems

    Applied Ergonomics

    (1983)
  • P. Lavie

    Ultrashort sleep-waking schedule III. “Gates” and “forbidden zones” for sleep

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1986)
  • J. Barton et al.

    Advancing versus delaying shift systems

    Ergonomics

    (1993)
  • C.A. Czeisler et al.

    Exposure to bright light and darkness to treat physiologic maladaptation to night work

    The New England J Medicine

    (1990)
  • C.A. Czeisler et al.

    Rotating shift work schedules that disrupt sleep are improved by applying circadian principles

    Science

    (1982)
  • K. Dahlgren

    Long-term adjustment of circadian rhythms to a rotating shiftwork schedule

    Scand J Work Environ Health

    (1981)
  • E.G. De Haan

    Improving shiftwork schedules in a bus company: towards more autonomy

  • R. Epstein et al.

    Sleep-wake cycle in rotating shift workers: Effects of changing from phase advance to phase delay rotation

  • V. Escriba et al.

    Shiftwork: its impact on the length and quality of sleep among nurses of the Valencian region in Spain

    Int Arch Occup Environ Health

    (1992)
  • S. Folkard

    Is there a “best compromise” shift system?

    Ergonomics

    (1992)
  • S. Folkard et al.

    Sleep and mood on a “weekly” rotating (7-7-7) shift system: some preliminary results

  • S. Folkard et al.

    Circadian variations in performance. Implications for abnormal work hours

  • S. Folkard et al.

    Short and longterm adjustment of circadian rhythms in “permanent” night nurses

    Ergonomics

    (1978)
  • J. Foret et al.

    Shiftwork: the level of adjustment to schedule reversal assessed by a sleep study

    Waking and Sleeping

    (1978)
  • G. Hildebrandt et al.

    Physiological criteria for the optimization of shift work (relations to field studies)

  • S. Hornberger et al.

    Interindividual differences on the subjective valuation of leisure time utility

    Ergonomics

    (1993)
  • B. Jansen et al.

    The inconvenience of shiftwork (case based on the innovative compensatory functions model)

    European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

    (1983)
  • Cited by (107)

    • Fifty years of operational research: 1972–2022

      2023, European Journal of Operational Research
    • Keeping the service running: Examining working relationships and workload of London bus network iBus controllers

      2022, Applied Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Controllers' work shifts, safety and fatigue should be a main consideration when designing schedules and this could be achieved by using forward rotating shift patterns, allowing at least 11 h rest between shifts (Health and Safety Executive, 2006; Wong et al., 2019). Forward shift rotations are seen as the preferred shift pattern in order to reduce fatigue amongst shift workers (Knauth, 1996) as this pattern ensures workers have a minimum of 11 h between shifts which enables them to receive the recommended 7–8 h sleep for adults (Hirshkowitz et al., 2015). Additionally, increasing the number of breaks per duty (and ensuring breaks are taken) (Tucker et al., 2003), and using biomathematical models, such as the HSE FRI (Bowler & Gibbon, 2015), when designing shift schedules may be beneficial.

    • A GRASP-based algorithm for solving the emergency room physician scheduling problem

      2021, Applied Soft Computing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Complex constraints add to the difficulty of finding good and equitable schedules for the physicians. Examples of ergonomic constraints are described in Knauth [1], while Gendreau et al. [2] offer an overview of other typical constraints to classifying them into four categories: (1) supply and demand, (2) workload, (3) fairness and (4) ergonomics, based on five case studies performed in Canadian hospitals. This paper addresses a real physician scheduling problem in which constraints of all four categories are considered.

    • The impact of the shift system on health and quality of life of sleep technicians

      2020, Sleep Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The psychosocial effects have rarely been measured in comparisons between fixed night and rotating shift workers. The results of this study support the general recommendation to avoid a permanent night shift because of its potential negative psychosocial and health effects [2,3]. The slow rotating group had comparatively favorable health and quality of life profiles in this study.

    • Do we want to keep working in 12-h shifts? The follow-up of the work schedule change in a Portuguese industrial company

      2020, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The implementation of the 2 × 12 h schedule brought the reduction in the number of work shifts per year, though, on average, the number of hours of work per week is the same (42 h). On the other hand, even though the shifts are now longer, the characteristics of the 2 × 12 h schedule are, apparently, in line with some of the main criteria defined under the scope of activity ergonomics and chronobiology (Knauth, 1996; Kundi, 2003; Ferguson and Dawson, 2012). This schedule in 2 × 12 h registers the following conditions:

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text