Elsevier

Health Policy

Volume 34, Issue 3, December 1995, Pages 193-204
Health Policy

Accreditation: what can we learn from the Anglophone model?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(95)00766-0Get rights and content

Abstract

There is growing interest in the development and application of standards for the health care to both promote quality assurance but also to improve the processes by which health services are held accountable to the public. This paper maps the development of organisational accreditation systems in the USA, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom. In the USA, accreditation, which began as a means of ensuring the correct environment for clinical practice has developed into a form of public regulation. In the United Kingdom, many different approaches to the setting of standards and their assessment has created a variety of accreditation systems. The case studies demonstrate that as the concept of accreditation diffuses into the health care systems of different countries, it is being adapted to meet the wider policy needs of different national circumstances.

References (22)

  • R. Maxwell et al.

    Seeking quality

    The Lancet

    (1/8 January 1983)
  • E.G. Heidemann
  • J.S. Robertson et al.

    A History of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1987)
  • C.E. Rosenberg
  • P. Starr
  • D. Legge

    Quality Assurance in US Hospitals: a view from Australia

    Australian Clinical Review

    (1982)
  • American Journal of Nursing

    (1992)
  • Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organisations
  • W.F. Ballinger et al.

    Total quality management and continuous quality improvement: an introduction for surgeons

    Surgery

    (1993)
  • W. Bogdenich

    Prized by hospitals, accreditation hides perils patients face

    The Wall Street Journal

    (October 12 1988)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Quality assurance of endoscopy units

      2011, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Accreditation is a formal declaration by a designated authority that an organisation or service has met pre-determined standards [8]. Accreditation schemes remain controversial and research based evidence of their effectiveness is limited to identifying as consistent positive outcomes that the activity of preparing and undergoing accreditation supports successful promotion of change in organisations [9–12] and has a positive influence on professional development [13,14]. Accreditation schemes are often challenged by professionals for being ‘managerial’, based on inappropriate standards and being excessively bureaucratic and costly.

    • Health economics: An international perspective

      2020, Health Economics: An International Perspective
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text