Original article
Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00564-1Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open archive

Abstract

We studied approaches to comorbidity risk adjustment by comparing two ICD-9-CM adaptations (Deyo, Dartmouth-Manitoba) of the Charlson comorbidity index applied to Massachusetts coronary artery bypass surgery data. We also developed a new comorbidity index by assigning study-specific weights to the original Charlson comorbidity variables. The 2 ICD-9-CM coding adaptations assigned identical Charlson comorbidity scores to 90% of cases, and specific comorbidities were largely found in the same cases (κ values of 0.72–1.0 for 15 of 16 comorbidities). Meanwhile, the study-specific comorbidity index identified a 10% subset of patients with 15% mortality, whereas the 5% highest-risk patients according to the Charlson index had only 8% mortality (p = 0.01). A model using the new index to predict mortality had better validated performance than a model based on the original Charlson index (c = 0.74 vs. 0.70). Thus, in our population, the ICD-9-CM adaptation used to create the Charlson score mattered little, but using study-specific weights with the Charlson variables substantially improved the power of these data to predict mortality.

Keywords

Comorbidity
case mix
risk adjustment
severity of illness
coronary artery bypass surgery
clinical index

Cited by (0)

This work was supported by Elliot M. Stone and staff at the Massachusetts Health Data Consortium, and by a grant from the Walnut Medical Charitable Trust.