ArticlesPhysical examination in the care of medical inpatients: an observational study
Introduction
Concerns about physicians' declining bedside skills have prompted the US National Board of Medical Examiners to propose that, beginning in 2004, physicians-in-training must demonstrate competence in physical examination before they can receive a medical licence. Currently, only about a quarter of US medical schools require their students to pass such tests as a condition of graduation.
However, even if all physicians acquire basic skills in physical examination, will they maintain and improve those skills throughout their professional careers? Very few residency programmes include physical diagnosis in their curricula.1, 2 Specialty board-certification examinations no longer require an oral component with demonstration of bedside skills. Continuing medical education conferences rarely offer opportunities to update skills in hands-on examination. Indeed, the time pressures of modern practice, combined with advances in diagnostic technology, seem to undermine the value of these skills. Is expertise in physical examination still important in clinical medicine?
This question is reminiscent of scepticism in the 1980s about the importance of the autopsy. At that time, declining hospital autopsy rates prompted Goldman and colleagues3, 4 to compare the value of autopsies in periods before and after the availability of new diagnostic imaging technologies. These investigators found that the autopsy's yield remained substantial (major diagnoses unsuspected pre-mortem in 22–25% of patients), undiminished from 1959 through 1985. Their findings energised efforts to revive the autopsy as an essential quality improvement process in hospitals.
Thus, it seems noteworthy that no previously published studies have addressed the clinical importance of physical examination in the care of patients in hospital.
Section snippets
Background
In the week after completing a rotation as an attending physician in a hospital, this author began teaching an introductory physical diagnosis course to second-year medical students. In response to students' questions about the importance of physical examination in the care of inpatients, I searched PubMed for English-language medical published work from 1966 through 2001. Finding no data directly relevant to this question, I reviewed the medical charts of all patients who had been admitted to
Results
100 patients were admitted to my service during the 28-day period. Patients' mean age was 55 years; their median hospital length of stay was 3 days. Patients' principal final diagnoses are listed in table 1. Six patients died in hospital. For 28 patients, various language barriers affected my initial clinical assessment.
Chart review identified 37 patients with possible pivotal findings. The adjudication panel rejected 11 of these because they did not meet all the criteria; the remaining 26
Discussion
These results show that physical examination can have a substantial effect on the care of medical inpatients. About one in every four (26%) patients in the present investigation had pivotal physical findings. In many patients, these findings prompted active collaboration by specialist consultants to perform urgent surgical (or other invasive) procedures. The seven patients with class 1 findings were especially important because diagnostic testing other than physical examination would probably
References (32)
- et al.
An objective measure of clinical performance
Am J Med
(1987) - et al.
Teaching cardiovascular examination skills: results from a randomized controlled trial
Am J Med
(1993) - et al.
Using root cause analysis to address patient satisfaction and other improvement opportunities
Jt Comm J Qual Improv
(2000) - et al.
Creation and assessment of a structured review course in physical diagnosis for medical residents
J Gen Intern Med
(1994) - et al.
An advanced physical diagnosis course for internal medicine residents
Acad Med
(1997) - et al.
The value of the autopsy in three medical eras
N Engl J Med
(1983) - et al.
Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital
N Engl J Med
(1988) - et al.
The lasting value of clinical skills
JAMA
(1985) - et al.
Physical examination: frequently observed errors
JAMA
(1976) - et al.
Assessment of clinical skills of residents utilizing standardized patients
Ann Intern Med
(1991)
Assessing housestaff diagnostic skills using a cardiology patient simulator
Ann Intern Med
Assessment of basic physical examination skills of internal medicine residents
Acad Med
Detection and correction of house staff error in physical diagnosis
JAMA
How well do internal medicine faculty members evaluate the clinical skills of residents?
Ann Intern Med
The rational clinial examination. A primer on the precision and accuracy of the clinical examination
JAMA
The clinical examination. An agenda to make it more rational
JAMA
Cited by (162)
The Reply
2023, American Journal of MedicineRelationship of Physical Examination Technique to Associated Clinical Skills: Results from a Direct Observation Assessment
2022, American Journal of MedicinePhysical examination
2022, Goldsmith's Assisted Ventilation of the Neonate: An Evidence-Based Approach to Newborn Respiratory Care, Seventh EditionImplications of the COVID-19 Pandemic for Cardiovascular Disease and Risk-Factor Management
2021, Canadian Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Physical examination still has a role in medical practice even in 2020. Although it is well known that the accuracy of diagnoses are doubled when clinicians examine patients rather than just hear their histories,25 it is not unreasonable to hypothesize that the therapeutic alliance formed between patient and physician when face to face26 is much stronger than when those visits are merely virtual. As pointed out by Chwistek, “There is no doubt that the virtual visit is a fundamental alteration to the patient-physician encounter…an imposed order commands the in-person visit, and it travels beyond the verbal: body language, rush of emotions, physical proximity, and touch.