CommentaryHomoeopathy trials: going nowhere
References (5)
- et al.
Low molecular weight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis
Lancet
(1992) - et al.
Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials
Lancet
(1990)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (81)
Modern obstetrics: beyond early delivery for fetal or maternal compromise
2021, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFMA likelihood-based approach to P-value interpretation provided a novel, plausible, and clinically useful research study metric
2017, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyWhy we should let "evidence-based medicine" rest in peace
2013, Clinics in DermatologyCitation Excerpt :The take-away message was simple. Trials and meta-analyses are much noisier forms of evidence than many had imagined.10 None of this should have been too surprising.
Scientability - A concept for the handling of homeopathic remedies by EbM
2013, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im GesundheitswesenWhen do we need scientific evidence?
2010, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im GesundheitswesenIsopathic treatment effects of Arsenicum album 45x on wheat seedling growth - further reproduction trials
2009, HomeopathyCitation Excerpt :The existence of specific effects of homeopathic remedies in ultramolecular dilution is controversial,1 although nearly all quantitative meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials are in favour of specific homeopathic remedy effects when studying defined medical conditions.2–7
Copyright © 1997 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.