ArticlesPrevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial
Introduction
There is a need for strategies to prevent falls in older people.1, 2 The cost of falling is high both to the individual in terms of physical3, 4 and psychological trauma,5 loss of independence,6, 7 or even death,8, 9 and to health and allied services8, 10, 11 in terms of resources and bed occupancy.
There is still no agreed approach to the management of elderly people who fall, and previous studies have produced conflicting results12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Direct comparison between studies is hampered by differences in methods, lack of clarity in definition, and differences in study populations and intervention strategies.
8% of people aged 70 years and above seek care in accident and emergency departments each year for fall-related injuries,7 and of these, 30–40% are admitted to hospital.21 About 50% of elderly patients discharged from accident and emergency departments show an increase in dependency,6, 22 in many cases related to trauma; yet the emergency department records make little reference to functional ability and support services are underused6 Although accident and emergency departments are a prime location for identification of functional problems and referral of patients, previous studies have shown important underdiagnosis of remediable problems in older people.23
We did a randomised controlled study to ascertain whether a structured bidisciplinary assessment of elderly people, who live in the community and attend an accident and emergency department with a primary diagnosis of a fall, could alter outcome and decrease the rate of further falls during the 12-month follow-up period. Secondary endpoints were death, major injury, moves to institutional care, functional status, and use of health care.
Section snippets
Participants
We recruited patients between December, 1995, and the end of June, 1996. All patients aged 65 years and above, who lived in the local community and attended the accident and emergency department with a primary diagnosis of a fall were potentially eligible. Formal ethics committee approval was obtained for the study. We excluded patients with cognitive impairment defined as a score on the abbreviated mental test (AMT)24 of less than 7 and with no regular carer because of difficulties with
Demography
1031 consecutive patients aged 65 years or older attended the accident and emergency department with a primary diagnosis of a fall during the recruitment period (figure 1). This total represents 20% of all attendees and 14% of emergency admissions for this age-group. The ultimately randomised number of patients was 397 (39%). The commonest reason for not proceeding to randomisation was inabilty to contact patients after the attendance at the accident and emergency department. Table 1 summarises
Discussion
This controlled study has shown the efficacy of a structured interdisciplinary approach to the management and prevention of falls in older people in a routine service setting. The numbers of subsequent falls and people with recurrent falls were significantly and substantially reduced. The multifactorial approach is consistent with the prospective identification of risk factors used previously in institutional and community settings.12, 13 We applied our strategy in a more routine, and
References (33)
- et al.
Descriptive epidemiology of injury in the south east: identifying priorities for action
Public Health
(1996) - et al.
"Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician
J Psychiatr Res
(1975) - et al.
Effect of external hip protectors on hip fractures
Lancet
(1993) Our healthier nation: a contract for health
(1998)Global strategy for health for all by the year 2000
(1981)Factors associated with serious injury during falls by ambulatory nursing home residents
J Am Geriatr Soc
(1987)- et al.
Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community
N Engl J Med
(1988) - et al.
Fear of falling and fall-related efficacy in relationship to functioning among community living elders
J Gerontol
(1994) - et al.
Ederly patients discharged from an accident and emergency department-their dependency and support
Arch Emerg Med
(1984) - et al.
The incidence of fall injury events among the elderly in a defined population
Am J Epidemiol
(1990)
Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures
BMJ
Falls presenting to the accident and emergency department: types of presentation and risk factor profile
Age Ageing
The cost of treating hip fractures in the twenty-first century
J Public Health Med
The value of assessing falls in the elderly population: a randomised clinical trial
Ann Intern Med
A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community
N Engl J Med
A randomized trial of physical rehabilitation for very frail nursing home residents
JAMA
Cited by (784)
Status of Vision and Eye Care Among Patients in Rehabilitation Hospital Units: A Cross-Sectional Study
2024, Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationDoes CGA Improve Health Outcomes in the Community? An Umbrella Review
2023, Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationEpidemiology of Product-Related Ocular Injuries in the United States From 2001 to 2020
2022, Journal of Emergency MedicineIdentifying Appropriate Nursing Home Resources to Reduce Fall-Related Emergency Department Transfers
2022, Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationA hybrid model to identify fall occurrence from electronic health records
2022, International Journal of Medical InformaticsCollaborative design and implementation of a clinical decision support system for automated fall-risk identification and referrals in emergency departments
2022, HealthcareCitation Excerpt :This is understandable given differences in patient acuity, clinical environment, care practices, and workflow compared to other clinical and inpatient settings.33–38 A few ED-specific interventions for identifying and referring high-risk patients for fall prevention services have proven efficacy, but their delivery is dependent upon real-time effort by ED providers and staff.22,39–42 In general, in-person screening tools requiring extensive time and human resources are a known barrier to widespread adoption in the ED, regardless of feasibility or efficacy.27,28,43,44