A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation
Section snippets
Decision support framework
Our decision support framework (DSF) is based on expectancy value, decisional conflict, and social support theories 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. It was developed for health decisions that: (1) are stimulated by a new circumstance, diagnosis, or developmental transition; (2) require careful deliberation because of the uncertain and/or value-sensitive nature of the benefits and risks; and (3) need relatively more effort during the deliberation phase than the implementation phase. Therefore the
The HRT decision aid
The early prototypes of the HRT decision aid were developed using an iterative process with the research team and panels of clients, medical and nursing practitioners, and educators. These groups guided its development using criteria such as need, feasibility, and appropriateness and acceptability of the objectives, content, and decision support methods.
We structured the content of the decision aid according to the ACP counseling guidelines [1]and delivered it using a self-administered,
Before/after study design
Participants were screened and recruited over six months from 6 family practices in downtown Ottawa, Canada. Following a routine office visit, the participants completed a baseline questionnaire eliciting their knowledge, personal expectations and importance ratings of HRT benefits and risks, current leaning toward taking HRT, and decisional conflict. At the next office visit, before seeing their physician, participants completed the decision aid and another questionnaire. The timing of our
Results
Demographic and clinical characteristics (summarized in Table 2) show that participants were approximately equally distributed in terms of their age group, current use of HRT, and hysterectomy status. The majority of participants: had at least some post secondary education; preferred to share decision making with their practitioner; had at least one risk factor for CHD; and did not report having low bone density or a first degree relative with breast cancer. The characteristics of the sample
Discussion
This before/after study demonstrated that the decision aid performed according to the predictions of the DSF: reducing uncertainty, increasing knowledge, creating realistic expectations, clarifying values, and supporting decision making. It is promising that over half of the women exposed to a decision aid had good general knowledge and realistic expectations, and felt they had enough advice to make a decision. Considering the large numbers of women who will reach menopausal age over the next
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by the Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada and the Medical Research Council of Canada.
References (25)
- et al.
Physicians' opinions about decision aids for patients considering systemic adjuvant therapy for axillary-node negative breast cancer
Patient Edu Counsel
(1997) - et al.
Information and decision making preferences of hospitalized adult patients
Soc Sci Med
(1988) - et al.
Framing effects on expectations, decisions and side effects experienced: The case of influenza immunization
J Clin Epidemiol
(1996) - American College of Physicians. Guidelines for counselling postmenopausal women about preventive hormone therapy. Ann...
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, Canadian Menopause Consensus Conf. JSOGC...
- et al.
Decision support interventions: More is not necessarily better
Med Dec Making
(1994) Clinical decision making in the face of uncertainty: Hormone replacement therapy as an example
J Family Practice
(1996)- et al.
Testing a portable, self-administered decision aid for post-menopausal women considering long-term hormone replacement therapy to prevent osteoporosis and heart disease
Med Dec Making
(1994) - Hayward R, pers. comm., McMaster...
- Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley and...
Cited by (488)
Shared decision-making and its influencing factors among parents of children with cancer in China: A cross-sectional study
2024, European Journal of Oncology NursingGenetic testing decision-making experiences within families of colorectal cancer patients: A qualitative study
2023, European Journal of Oncology Nursing