Clinical StudyCompliance with clinical practice guidelines in family physicians managing worker's compensation board patients with acute lower back pain☆
Introduction
Approximately 40% of all worker's compensation board (WCB) claims concern back injuries. The majority of these claims involve acute injury to the soft tissues of the lower back or acute mechanical lower back pain. The WCB in the Province of British Columbia recently compiled, published and distributed clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute mechanical lower back pain to all family physicians in this province [1]. These guidelines were based primarily on extensive and critical reviews of the literature carried out by a number of expert panels, which included the Agency on Health Care Policy and Research (US National Institutes of Health) [2], the Industrial Medicine Council of California [3] and the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders [4]. Since that time, several other countries have convened multidisciplinary expert panels and have published similar guidelines [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. As such, these guidelines are derived exclusively from the best available scientific evidence or expert panel consensus and are independent of any bias associated with worker/employer special interest issues.
Family physicians are the most common portal of entry into the health-care system for injured workers and are therefore in a unique position to significantly influence the clinical management of this group of patients. It has been demonstrated that the patterns of practice of family physicians managing patients with lower back pain varies widely [10] and is resistant to change [11], [12]. Furthermore, patients who receive compensation benefits are at increased risk for treatment failure, overuse of narcotics and for delayed return to preinjury activities [13], [14]. Thus, family physician adherence to a patient management strategy that has the greatest potential for enhancing recovery by emphasizing evidence-based treatments and lessening the influence of interventions that have no long-term value or may prolong recovery from injury would seem to be of particular importance in these patients. This study investigated the degree to which the patterns of practice of a group of British Columbia family physicians was in compliance with the current clinical practice guidelines for managing patients with acute mechanical lower back pain who have an accepted WCB claim.
Section snippets
Methods
The research design was an observational study. It involved a consecutive sample of 139 different family physicians identified through the WCB database who submitted First Report forms identifying a patient with acute lower back pain without lower extremity involvement (i.e., Quebec Task Force Categories I and II) of 2 to 3 weeks duration. Each physician in the study managed one patient. The subsequent Progress Reports of the physicians whose patients went on to have approved WCB claims were
Results
As shown in Fig. 3, 89% of attending family physicians in the study group reported information relating to the history of the initiating event of the acute episode, and 24% also reported information regarding prior episodes of similar symptoms. In addition, recorded physical examination information showed that 63% of physicians reported carrying out a neurological examination that was consistent with guideline recommendations. However, only 5% of physicians reported assessing patients for “red
Discussion
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are now being developed and introduced to many areas of medical practice. These guidelines currently represent the “gold standard” of health care. They are derived mainly from research studies that, using sound methodology, have clearly demonstrated that a particular therapy/treatment has proven efficacy/effectiveness and that other treatments are either ineffective or actually increase morbidity. As such, clinical practice guidelines have the
References (18)
- Campin C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Worker's Compensation...
- et al.
Clinical practice guideline number 4: acute low back problems in adults
(December 1994) Practice parameter: low back problems (draft April 27, 1994)
(1994)- et al.
Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders
Spine
(1987) - et al.
Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison
Spine
(2001) - et al.
Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain: the role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain
Spine
(2000) - et al.
Guide to assessing psychosocial yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long-term disability and work loss
(1997) - Royal College of General Practitioners. Clinical guidelines for the management of acute low back pain. Available at:...
- et al.
Clinical guidelines in the management of low back pain
Baillieres Clin Rheumatol
(1998)
Cited by (80)
Imaging for low back pain: is clinical use consistent with guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis
2018, Spine JournalCitation Excerpt :In 19 studies (58%), the target population was not representative of a typical LBP population presenting to primary care [6,20,21,23,25,26,28–30,33,36,38–40,43–45,48,49]. The proportion of patients deemed as inappropriate for imaging of the sample that had been previously referred for imaging was assessed in 23 studies [7,21,22,25–29,31–37,39–43,45,46,50] (Supplementary Table S2), with pooled results in Fig. 2. The absence of red flag clinical features was the criterion in 15 studies [22,26,29,31,32,34,35,37,39–43,46,50] (N=1,805), providing low quality evidence that the proportion of inappropriate referral was 34.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.1, 43.3).
The Chiropractic Hospital-Based Interventions Research Outcomes Study: Consistency of Outcomes between Doctors of Chiropractic Treating Patients with Acute Lower Back Pain
2015, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsAttitudes, beliefs, and recommendations for persistent low back pain patients: cross-sectional surveys of students and faculty at a chiropractic college
2024, Chiropractic and Manual Therapies
- ☆
FDA device/drug status: not applicable.
Nothing of value received from a commercial entity related to this research.