Original ContributionMedication prescribing errors in the prehospital setting and in the ED
Introduction
Medication errors are a common cause of iatrogenic adverse events [1]. They can lead to severe morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, unnecessary diagnostic tests, unnecessary treatments, and death [2], [3]. Medication errors have been estimated to harm 1% to 2% of patients admitted to UK and US hospitals [4], [5]—most attributable to prescribing errors [2], [6], [7].
Preventable errors are significantly more common in the emergency and intensive care units than in any other hospital departments [1], [8]. In the emergency department (ED), the lack of continuity of patient care, coupled with an inadequate information infrastructure for care across the continuum, often forces emergency providers to see patients without all the information needed to make well-informed decisions [9], [10].
In a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care ED by Patanwala et al [11], 1 or more medication errors were found in almost 60% of the patients. In 37% of the cases, an error affected the patients; but only 1 error resulted in patient harm.
Resuscitation is an extremely stressful and uncontrolled situation for the medical staff. The physician must respond promptly to the needs of an unstable patient for whom often very limited information is available. In a study on medication errors during pediatric mock resuscitations, medication errors were found in 7 of 8 mock resuscitations [12].
Data on the incidence and nature of medication errors during prehospital treatment and transport are limited. In a survey among paramedics in San Diego, 9% of the paramedics reported medication errors [13].
We hypothesized that because of the lack of adequate time, together with the far from ideal conditions in the emergency medical services (EMS) setting, the rate of medication errors in the EMS setting is likely to be higher than in the ED. The objectives of the current study were to describe the incidence and characteristics of medication errors during prehospital treatment and to compare it with the incidence of errors in the ED.
Section snippets
Design
This is a retrospective chart review of adult patients transferred by EMS to a large teaching hospital in Israel.
Setting
Magen David Adom is the largest EMS service in Israel and provides most prehospital EMS services in Israel. Mobile intensive care unit (MICU) ambulances are equipped with medications and staffed with either paramedics or a physician. The staff is capable of providing advanced life support.
Assaf Harofeh is a large university-affiliated hospital in central Israel, serving a population
Results
One thousand eight hundred thirty-seven patients were brought to Assaf Harofe ED by an emergency vehicle during 2007. Five hundred thirty-six patient charts (29%) were randomly selected for review. Sixty-five charts (12.12%) could not be found; thus, 471 remaining charts were included in our study. In 59 charts, there was no information about the EMS evacuation; and in 14 charts, there was no information about the treatment in the ED. More than 95% of the emergency vehicle charts were
Discussion
In a large cohort of adult patients transferred to the hospital by MICUs, 12.76% of the patients receiving medications in the emergency vehicle; and 36.1% of patients treated in the ED were subject to a medication error.
In the emergency vehicle as well as in the ED, a higher risk for error was found in patients treated with large number of medications. In the prehospital setting, long evacuation time was associated with higher risk for drug errors. In the ED, less errors were found in trauma
Conclusions
There are more medication errors in the ED than in emergency vehicles. Patients treated with a large number of medications are more prone to medication errors; trauma patients are less subject to medication errors.
References (24)
Medication errors in the emergency department: a systems approach to minimizing risk
Emerg Med Clin North Am
(2003)- et al.
The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement
Jt Comm J Qual Improv
(1995) - et al.
Standardization as a mechanism to improve safety in health care
Jt Comm J Qual Saf
(2004) - et al.
The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard medical practice study II
N Engl J Med
(1991) - et al.
Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention
JAMA
(1995) - et al.
Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality
JAMA
(1997) - et al.
The incidence of medication errors and ways to reduce them
Clinical Risk
(1998) - et al.
Exploring the causes of adverse events in NHS hospital practice
J R Soc Med
(2001) - et al.
Systems analysis of adverse drug events
JAMA
(1995) - et al.
The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patient. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group
JAMA
(1997)
Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado
Med care
“Crossing the quality chasm” in emergency medicine
Acad Emerg Med
Cited by (30)
Incidence of prescription errors in patients discharged from the emergency department
2021, American Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :The Emergency Department (ED) is known for its high rates of medication errors secondary to many of its unique characteristics. In the often high-stress environment encountered in the ED, complicating factors such as unfamiliar patients, lack of continuity of care, increasing patient volumes, reliance on verbal orders, and fewer safety mechanisms contribute to increased risk of medication errors [1-5]. Nearly 1.5 million preventable adverse drug events occur in the United States every year, costing hospitals at least $2 billion and contributing to over 7000 deaths [1].
Factors Influencing Medication Errors in the Prehospital Paramedic Environment: A Mixed Method Systematic Review
2023, Prehospital Emergency Care