Major Article
Translating infection prevention evidence into practice using quantitative and qualitative research

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2005.05.017Get rights and content

Infection control professionals and hospital epidemiologists, using the valid methods of applied epidemiology–surveillance, benchmarking, intervention, evaluation–have largely been responsible for dramatically reducing the incidence of health care-associated infections over the past several decades. However, we believe that the field of infection control can–and should–also be a leader in understanding how research findings can be efficiently and effectively translated into clinical practice. Unfortunately, there is no current reliable information about which preventive practices are being used in US hospitals to prevent common device-related infections. If we are to understand how best to translate research into practice, the reasons hospitals are using some preventive practices–or are not–must be explored more fully. This article provides a framework for one proposed research endeavor to promote the successful translation of proven infection prevention practices and a subsequent decrease in health care-associated infections. In addition, we hope that this article will stimulate increased interest and research in identifying strategies that will successfully move evidence from the peer-reviewed literature to the patient's bedside.

Section snippets

Study overview

Drawing on the conceptual framework described in detail above, we plan to study the adoption and implementation of important, evidence-based infection prevention practices. More specifically, we are using a sequential mixed methods study design that relates a quantitative survey data analysis phase to a qualitative semistructured interview and observational phase (see Fig 2).55 In the first phase, we will survey hospital infection control professionals to describe quantitatively and compare the

Conclusion

Infection control and hospital epidemiology is a modern day success story. Infection control professionals and hospital epidemiologists, using the valid methods of applied epidemiology–surveillance, benchmarking, intervention, evaluation–have largely been responsible for dramatically reducing the incidence of HAIs over the past several decades. We believe that the field of infection control can–and should–also be a leader in understanding how research findings can be efficiently and effectively

References (59)

  • J. Kaye et al.

    Critical care bug team: a multidisciplinary team approach to reducing ventilator-associated pneumonia

    Am J Infect Control

    (2000)
  • L.I. Solberg

    Guideline implementation: what the literature doesn't tell us

    Joint Commission J Qual Improv

    (2000)
  • J.L. Gerberding

    Hospital-onset infections: a patient safety issue

    Ann Intern Med

    (2002)
  • S.M. Berenholtz et al.

    Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit

    Crit Care Med

    (2004)
  • S. Saint et al.

    The potential clinical and economic benefits of silver alloy urinary catheters in preventing urinary tract infection

    Arch Intern Med

    (2000)
  • H.R. Collard et al.

    Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: an evidence-based systematic review

    Ann Intern Med

    (2003)
  • I. Raad et al.

    Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (1994)
  • Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety...
  • M.J. Richards et al.

    Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System

    Crit Care Med

    (1999)
  • C. Zhan et al.

    Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization

    JAMA

    (2003)
  • R.R. Roberts et al.

    The use of economic modeling to determine the hospital costs associated with nosocomial infections

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2003)
  • J.P. Burke

    Patient safety: infection control–a problem for patient safety

    N Engl J Med

    (2003)
  • Anonymous

    National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) report, data summary from October 1986-April 1997, issued May 1997: a report from the NNIS System

    Am J Infect Control

    (1997)
  • Anonymous

    National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) report, data summary from October 1986-April 1996, issued May 1996: a report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System

    Am J Infect Control

    (1996)
  • W.J. Martone et al.

    National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) semiannual report, May 1995: a report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System

    Am J Infect Control

    (1995)
  • T.C. Horan et al.

    Nosocomial infections in surgical patients in the United States, January 1986-June 1992: National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (1993)
  • Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system

    (2000)
  • W.H. Frist

    Shattuck lecture: health care in the 21st Century

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • Rundle RL. Some push to make hospitals disclose rates of infection. Wall Street Journal February 1, 2005. p. A1,...
  • Cited by (50)

    • Status of hospital infection prevention practices in Thailand in the era of COVID-19: Results from a national survey

      2022, American Journal of Infection Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      We selected a convenience sample of 20 hospitals within each of the 5 broad geographic regions (North, South, East, West, and Northeastern) to achieve national representation. The survey instrument, first developed by Krein, Saint, and colleagues,11-14 has undergone multiple recent revisions. The survey was translated from English into Thai by an experienced hospital epidemiologist.

    • Barriers and enablers to implementinghospital-acquired urinary tract infection prevention strategies: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework

      2021, Journal of Hospital Infection
      Citation Excerpt :

      This study therefore aimed to identify the perceived barriers and enablers of nurses and doctors to implementing prevention strategies against hospital-acquired UTIs in an Australian subacute hospital. This knowledge provides the foundation for designing effective behaviour and practice change interventions to facilitate uptake and adherence to proven hospital-acquired UTI prevention strategies, thereby translating to optimal patient outcomes [13,14]. A qualitative descriptive design using semi-structured interviews was employed to explore the experiences of nurses and doctors at the study site and to gain detailed insight into the factors they perceived as facilitating or hindering their implementation of hospital-acquired UTI prevention strategies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by grant funding from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development Service (SAF 04-031); by a Career Development Award from the Health Services Research and Development Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs (to S.S.); and by a Patient Safety Developmental Center Grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (P20-HS11540, to T.P.H. and S.S.).

    View full text