Brief reportAssessing the thoroughness of hand hygiene: “Seeing is believing”
Section snippets
Methods
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital. Under the anonymity basis, oral informed consent was obtained from each participant.
The HH technique campaign for HCWs was conducted between May 1 and May 30, 2012. The HCWs volunteered to participate in this event. We educated the HCWs on proper HH technique using a 7-step procedure with a Chinese Kong-Fu–based slogan: interior, exterior, interlacing, bow, thumbs, fingertips, and wrists (Fig 1). During the
Results
A total of 388 HCWs from 30 of the hospital's 85 wards volunteered to participate in this study, including 64 doctors, 253 nurses, and 60 other HCWs. The average age of participants was 32.1 ± 8.1 years (range, 18-60 years). The majority of participants were female (80.2%; 311 of 388).
For all participants, the duration of HH exceeded the recommended 10-15 seconds, ranging from 11 to 260 seconds (mean, 57.4 ± 38.9 seconds). Most participants could wash off the fluorescent agent, with 135 of 386
Discussion
In this study, we have demonstrated that a stress-free, “seeing is believing” simulation program can be successfully adapted for HH education. We provided feedback to HCWs identifying the nails and fingertips as the most frequently missed spots. The integration of knowledge, practice, and visual feedback can strengthen the learning process and improve the compliance with and thoroughness of HH.
Simulation techniques have been adopted in the health care system to protect patient safety. A benefit
Acknowledgments
We thank David Devore for his critical review of the manuscript. We are grateful to members of the NTUH Center for Infection Control for their sustained support of the hand hygiene program, as well as the hospital staff for their commitment to improving patient safety and reducing health care–associated infections.
Author contributions: Y.-C.C., K.-L.T., and S.-C.P. conceived and designed the experiments; K.-L.T. and I.-C.H. performed the experiments; K.-L.T. and E.C. analyzed the data; E.C.,
References (13)
Nosocomial infections in adult intensive-care units
Lancet
(2003)- et al.
Prevalence of hospital-acquired infection in a Tunisian hospital
J Hosp Infect
(2005) - et al.
Prevalence of hospital-acquired infection in a Moroccan university hospital
Am J Infect Control
(2007) - et al.
The first prevalence survey of nosocomial infections in the University Hospital Centre “Mother Teresa” of Tirana, Albania
J Hosp Infect
(2007) - et al.
Changes in bacterial flora associated with skin damage on hands of health care personnel
Am J Infect Control
(1998) WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care
(2009)
Cited by (17)
Duration or technique to improve the effectiveness of children' hand hygiene: A randomized controlled trial
2021, American Journal of Infection ControlCitation Excerpt :Unlike the research findings, in a study by Pan et al., it was found that the areas missed in the dorsal area were more than palmar. In this study, the areas missed are marked by the observer, since the fluorescent coated area before handwashing, is not evaluated, it is not clear how much of these areas are cleaned.22 Vanyolos et al. on the other hand, stated that the most frequently missed area in medical students was the proximal part of the palm after the metacarpal regions.25
How to carry out microbiological sampling of healthcare environment surfaces? A review of current evidence
2019, Journal of Hospital InfectionCitation Excerpt :Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) lead to poor clinical outcomes and death [1]. In high-income countries HCAIs affect approximately 5–15% of patients, whereas in low-income countries prevalence rates are in the region of 15–19% [2]. In Europe, HCAIs are attributed to approximately 37,000 deaths per year and 25,000 people per year die from antibiotic-resistant HCAIs [3].
‘VIOLET’: a fluorescence-based simulation exercise for training healthcare workers in the use of personal protective equipment
2018, Journal of Hospital InfectionAssessment of hand hygiene techniques using the World Health Organization's six steps
2016, Journal of Infection and Public HealthCitation Excerpt :Park HY et al. [4] report better compliance in nurses (90.5%) but without differences in hand surface coverage between nurses (8.3%) and doctors (8.8%) and lower compliance rates for other healthcare professionals. Other studies have described the evaluation of HH quality using a fluorescent substance and adenosine triphosphate technology [5–7]. Pan SC [5] identifies the tips of the nail and the fingertips as the most common residue points after application of a fluorescent substance, and Szilagi L et al. [6] identified a failure to clean the dorsal and palmar areas in 24 and 18% of the instances.
Comparison of two alcohol hand rubbing techniques regarding hand surface coverage among hospital workers: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
2022, Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
The Center for Excellence for Hand Hygiene is supported by the Center for Disease Control, Department of Health, Taiwan (EU098040). Y. C. Chen also received a grant from the Department of Health, Taiwan (DOH100-TD-B-111-001). These funding organizations were not involved in study design or conduct; data collection, management, analysis, or interpretation; or manuscript preparation and approval.
Conflict of interest: None to report.
- †
S.-C.P. and E.C. contributed equally to this work.