Research ArticleCounty-Level Trends in Suicide Rates in the U.S., 2005–2015
Introduction
Suicide is a complex public health problem, influenced by multiple individual, community, and societal risk and protective factors.1 Since 2008, suicide has ranked as the tenth leading cause of death in the U.S.,2 and in 2015 accounted for more than 44,000 deaths.3
State differences in age-adjusted suicide rates (SRs) have been well documented, with Western states generally showing higher rates.4, 5 Although a more detailed understanding of geographic variation may be useful, attempts at estimating county-level SRs have been limited because the majority of counties report fewer than 20 suicide deaths per year. Direct estimates of SRs based on small numbers can be unstable and highly variable year to year, making it difficult to discern trends.6 To produce stable estimates, studies7 and web-based mapping tools3, 8 often aggregate over multiple years or states, potentially masking important trends and within-state variation, including urban–rural differences.9, 10
Previous studies have described urban–rural gradients in SRs and suggested that urban–rural differences may be widening, with SRs increasing more rapidly from 2000 to 2015 in less urban areas compared with more urban areas.10 However, county-level variation in SRs remains largely unexplored. More detailed examination of county-level patterns and trends, including urban–rural differences, can shed light on where SRs may have increased more rapidly and inform more targeted prevention efforts at the community level.1
Small area estimation methods11, 12, 13, 14 can be used to produce stable estimates of mortality rates at the county level, borrowing strength from nearby counties and over time, and overcoming limitations related to aggregating data over time or larger geographic units. The objective of this study is to apply these methods to generate estimates of annual county-level SRs for 2005 through 201515 in order to examine how SRs vary across counties in the U.S. and whether these patterns are consistent over time. Additionally, this study describes urban–rural disparities and trends, and the percentage of counties within each urban–rural category reporting larger or smaller increases in SRs over time.
Section snippets
Methods
Details about the statistical models and the advantages of the methods used are described elsewhere.15 A short description is provided below.
Results
In 2005, only 365 of 3,140 (12%) counties reported ≥20 suicide deaths, the threshold under which rate estimates are typically suppressed due to concerns about statistical reliability (i.e., lack of precision because of wide SEs)6; ≅16% of counties were above this threshold in 2015. Model-based SR estimates ranged from 4.76 suicides per 100,000 people to 64.16 suicides per 100,000 people (median county-level SR=13.98 per 100,000) in 2005, and from 5.72 to 89.10 per 100,000 (median county-level
Discussion
From 2005 to 2015, 99% of counties showed increases in model-based SRs of more than 10%. For 87% of the counties in the U.S., estimated SRs increased by more than 20% from 2005 through 2015, with about one third of counties (34%) exhibiting increases of more than 30%. Although there was substantial geographic variation in SRs over this time period across the U.S., the geographic patterns were relatively consistent over time. Specifically, counties across the western half of the U.S. were
Conclusions
From 2005 to 2015, estimated SRs increased by more than 20% for the majority of counties in the U.S. Counties with the highest SRs in 2005 tended to remain among the highest in 2015 and vice versa. More rural areas exhibited larger increases over the time period than more urban counties; increases of more than 20% were seen in 93% of the most rural counties, in contrast to 79% of suburban (i.e., large fringe metro) counties and 54% of the most urban (i.e., large central metro) counties. Nearly
Acknowledgments
This work was performed under employment by the U.S. federal government; the authors did not receive any outside funding.
The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.
References (35)
- et al.
Spatial patterns and neighborhood characteristics of overall suicide clusters in Florida from 2001 to 2010
Am J Prev Med
(2017) - et al.
Geography of suicide in Taiwan: spatial patterning and socioeconomic correlates
Health Place
(2011) Bayesian models for spatial incidence: a case study of suicide using the BUGS program
Health Place
(1997)- et al.
Economic recession, alcohol, and suicide rates: comparative effects of poverty, foreclosure, and job loss
Am J Prev Med
(2017) Explaining regional differences in suicide rates
Soc Sci Med
(1995)- et al.
Do hot spots of deprivation predict the rates of suicide within London boroughs?
Health Place
(2007) The geography of self-injury: spatial patterns in attempted and completed suicide
Soc Sci Med
(2006)HHS Office of the Surgeon General and the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention
2012 National Strategy for Suicide Prevention: Goals and Objectives for Action: A Report of the U.S. Surgeon General and of the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention
(2012)Deaths: leading causes for 2014
Natl Vital Stat Rep
(2016)- National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems Mortality–Underlying cause of death, all...