Research Article
County-Level Trends in Suicide Rates in the U.S., 2005–2015

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.020Get rights and content

Introduction

Understanding the geographic patterns of suicide can help inform targeted prevention efforts. Although state-level variation in age-adjusted suicide rates has been well documented, trends at the county-level have been largely unexplored. This study uses small area estimation to produce stable county-level estimates of suicide rates to examine geographic, temporal, and urban–rural patterns in suicide from 2005 to 2015.

Methods

Using National Vital Statistics Underlying Cause of Death Files (2005–2015), hierarchical Bayesian models were used to estimate suicide rates for 3,140 counties. Model-based suicide rate estimates were mapped to explore geographic and temporal patterns and examine urban–rural differences. Analyses were conducted in 2016–2017.

Results

Posterior predicted mean county-level suicide rates increased by >10% from 2005 to 2015 for 99% of counties in the U.S., with 87% of counties showing increases of >20%. Counties with the highest model-based suicide rates were consistently located across the western and northwestern U.S., with the exception of southern California and parts of Washington. Compared with more urban counties, more rural counties had the highest estimated suicide rates from 2005 to 2015, and also the largest increases over time.

Conclusions

Mapping county-level suicide rates provides greater granularity in describing geographic patterns of suicide and contributes to a better understanding of changes in suicide rates over time. Findings may inform more targeted prevention efforts as well as future research on community-level risk and protective factors related to suicide mortality.

Introduction

Suicide is a complex public health problem, influenced by multiple individual, community, and societal risk and protective factors.1 Since 2008, suicide has ranked as the tenth leading cause of death in the U.S.,2 and in 2015 accounted for more than 44,000 deaths.3

State differences in age-adjusted suicide rates (SRs) have been well documented, with Western states generally showing higher rates.4, 5 Although a more detailed understanding of geographic variation may be useful, attempts at estimating county-level SRs have been limited because the majority of counties report fewer than 20 suicide deaths per year. Direct estimates of SRs based on small numbers can be unstable and highly variable year to year, making it difficult to discern trends.6 To produce stable estimates, studies7 and web-based mapping tools3, 8 often aggregate over multiple years or states, potentially masking important trends and within-state variation, including urban–rural differences.9, 10

Previous studies have described urban–rural gradients in SRs and suggested that urban–rural differences may be widening, with SRs increasing more rapidly from 2000 to 2015 in less urban areas compared with more urban areas.10 However, county-level variation in SRs remains largely unexplored. More detailed examination of county-level patterns and trends, including urban–rural differences, can shed light on where SRs may have increased more rapidly and inform more targeted prevention efforts at the community level.1

Small area estimation methods11, 12, 13, 14 can be used to produce stable estimates of mortality rates at the county level, borrowing strength from nearby counties and over time, and overcoming limitations related to aggregating data over time or larger geographic units. The objective of this study is to apply these methods to generate estimates of annual county-level SRs for 2005 through 201515 in order to examine how SRs vary across counties in the U.S. and whether these patterns are consistent over time. Additionally, this study describes urban–rural disparities and trends, and the percentage of counties within each urban–rural category reporting larger or smaller increases in SRs over time.

Section snippets

Methods

Details about the statistical models and the advantages of the methods used are described elsewhere.15 A short description is provided below.

Results

In 2005, only 365 of 3,140 (12%) counties reported ≥20 suicide deaths, the threshold under which rate estimates are typically suppressed due to concerns about statistical reliability (i.e., lack of precision because of wide SEs)6; ≅16% of counties were above this threshold in 2015. Model-based SR estimates ranged from 4.76 suicides per 100,000 people to 64.16 suicides per 100,000 people (median county-level SR=13.98 per 100,000) in 2005, and from 5.72 to 89.10 per 100,000 (median county-level

Discussion

From 2005 to 2015, 99% of counties showed increases in model-based SRs of more than 10%. For 87% of the counties in the U.S., estimated SRs increased by more than 20% from 2005 through 2015, with about one third of counties (34%) exhibiting increases of more than 30%. Although there was substantial geographic variation in SRs over this time period across the U.S., the geographic patterns were relatively consistent over time. Specifically, counties across the western half of the U.S. were

Conclusions

From 2005 to 2015, estimated SRs increased by more than 20% for the majority of counties in the U.S. Counties with the highest SRs in 2005 tended to remain among the highest in 2015 and vice versa. More rural areas exhibited larger increases over the time period than more urban counties; increases of more than 20% were seen in 93% of the most rural counties, in contrast to 79% of suburban (i.e., large fringe metro) counties and 54% of the most urban (i.e., large central metro) counties. Nearly

Acknowledgments

This work was performed under employment by the U.S. federal government; the authors did not receive any outside funding.

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

References (35)

  • D.L. Karch et al.

    Surveillance for violent deaths–National Violent Death Reporting System, 16 states, 2006

    MMWR Surveill Summ

    (2009)
  • N. Kim et al.

    Altitude, gun ownership, rural areas, and suicide

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • C. Tiwari et al.

    The impact of data suppression on local mortality rates: the case of CDC WONDER

    Am J Public Health

    (2014)
  • CDC. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System Fatal Injury Mapping Module....
  • L.H. Chen et al.

    QuickStats: Age-adjusted rates for suicide,* by urbanization of county of residence† — United States, 2004 and 2013

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2015)
  • S.R. Kegler et al.

    Trends in suicide by level of urbanization—United States, 1999–2015

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2017)
  • A. Lawson

    Bayesian Disease Mapping: Hierarchical Modeling in Spatial Epidemiology

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text