Human factors/ergonomics as a systems discipline? “The human use of human beings” revisited
Section snippets
The quandary
In 2010 the International Ergonomics Association (IEA) put together a small working group to address the questions of how human factors/ergonomics (HFE) should best maintain and strengthen its discipline and profession. The main issues of the discussion were: (1) how to characterise the core of HFE – how to describe that which presumably distinguishes it as a field of science; (2) how best to attract people – students, researchers, and practitioners – into the field at all levels; and (3) how
The history
In order to understand the future of HFE, we must understand the past. The background for HFE was the need to find solutions to some practical problems. The problems were characteristic of the nature of work at the time – the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. Since the nature of work in the 2010, one hundred years later, is significantly different, it is only reasonable to consider whether the traditional formulations of the problems – and a forteriori also the solutions –
The traditional approach
The rest of this chapter will consider some issues raised in the paper by Dul et al. (2012) in the light of the above, in particular the suggestion that HFE should be seen as a systems science. The reason is that the issues presented by the paper represent widely shared views in the HFE community and that these views require some discussion.
Any such discussion must be based on a common understanding of what the subject of discussion is, in this case an understanding of what HFE is. To manage
A strategy for HFE
In the established HFE perspective, the goal of HFE is to “improve performance and well-being through systems design”, as noted above. At first glance this seems entirely reasonable. The performance is, presumably, related to the output or product of work, referring to such issues as quality, efficiency, or safety. We all work to produce something – tangible outputs in some cases and intangible outputs in other cases – and unless there is a ‘market’ for what we produce, taking the term ‘market’
References (16)
- et al.
Cognitive systems engineering: new wine in new bottles
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
(1983) - et al.
The Psychology of Human–Computer Interaction
(1983) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
(2000)- et al.
A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession
Ergonomics
(2012) Human Engineering for an Effective Air Navigation and Traffic-control System
(1951)- et al.
Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction
ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems
(1988) Forty years of IEA: some reflections on the evolution of ergonomics
Ergonomics
(1997)An Inquiry into the Human Prospect
(1974)