Elsevier

Applied Nursing Research

Volume 19, Issue 1, February 2006, Pages 38-42
Applied Nursing Research

Clinical Methods
Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2005.06.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Verbatim transcription of interview data has become a common data management strategy in nursing research and is widely considered to be integral to the analysis and interpretation of verbal data. As the benefits of verbal data are becoming more widely embraced in health care research, interviews are being increasingly used to collect information for a wide range of purposes. In addition to purely qualitative investigations, there has been a significant increase in the conduct of mixed-method inquiries. This article examines the issues surrounding the conduct of interviews in mixed-method research, with particular emphasis on the transcription and data analysis phases of data management. It also debates on the necessity to transcribe all audiorecorded interview data verbatim, particularly in relation to mixed-method investigations. Finally, it provides an alternative method to verbatim transcription of managing audiorecorded interview data.

Introduction

Interviews have been widely accepted as a common means of data collection in a range of health disciplines, including nursing, sociology, social work, and allied health, because they facilitate interactive dialogues between participants and researchers (Burnard, 1994a, Fasick, 2001, Fielding, 1994, Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003, Wellard & McKenna, 2001). Given this relationship and the emphasis on exploration and inquiry of human phenomenon, interviews have traditionally been a method of data collection associated with the naturalistic (qualitative) paradigm (Halcomb & Andrew, 2005). More recently, however, interviews have become recognized for their broader application in biomedical and collaborative research. Although details regarding the management of interview data and the process of transcription are often poorly described in published research, many investigators report that they audiorecord interviews for subsequent analysis and then somehow transform these audiotaped data into written text (Poland, 1995, Wellard & McKenna, 2001). Although several articles discuss how to manage interview transcripts (Burnard, 1994b, McCormack, 2000), the contemporary literature provides limited direction and guidance regarding the specifics of the transcription process (Easton et al., 2000, Fielding, 1994, Poland, 1995, Wellard & McKenna, 2001). This is a substantial gap in the literature considering the significance of the management of verbal data in the reliability and validity of the research process.

Although rarely explicitly defined, transcription refers to the process of reproducing spoken words, such as those from an audiotaped interview, into written text. In addition to spoken words, various authors have debated on the extent to which nonverbal cues (e.g., silences and body language) and emotional aspects (e.g., crying, coughs, and sighs) should be incorporated into transcribed text (MacLean et al., 2004, Wellard & McKenna, 2001). Verbatim transcription refers to the word-for-word reproduction of verbal data, where the written words are an exact replication of the audiorecorded words (Poland, 1995). Poland (1995) asserted that “the very notion of accuracy of transcription is problematic given the inter-subjective nature of human communication, and transcription as an interpretative activity” (p. 292). The way in which interview content is both heard and perceived by a transcriber, however, plays a key role in both the form and accuracy of transcription (MacLean et al., 2004).

Wellard & McKenna (2001) asserted that transcription forms part of the data analysis process and should be clearly disclosed in the methodology of a project. It is therefore essential for a transcription method that is congruent with the theoretical underpinnings of a specific investigation to be used. This observation identifies the potential to use alternate processes for managing verbal interview data other than conventional verbatim transcription techniques provided that they are consistent with the underlying philosophy of the methodology.

Initially, a review of the current literature relating to transcription and the use of interviews as a data collection strategy is presented. The cases for and against verbatim interview transcription are then discussed before an alternate method of data management for audiorecorded interview data is proposed.

Section snippets

Current state of the literature

In the 10-year period between 1990 and 2000, there were 2,957 articles published in biomedical journals and indexed in the CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsychInfo databases with the keyword “qualitative research.” Remarkably, when this search was repeated in the 5-year period between 2000 and 2004, there were 3,914 articles published. This demonstrates the significant increase in interest regarding qualitative data collection strategies in biomedical research. It is therefore timely to

Types of research interviews

Although collecting data using interviews has traditionally been associated with purely qualitative research, data collection strategies are not always linked solely to a single research paradigm (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003). Fig. 1 shows how the underlying philosophical approach can effect variations in interview purpose, process, and technique. It can also be identified that although an interview will generate verbal data, the richness and depth of these data will vary according to the

The case for verbatim transcription

A combination of verbatim transcription and researcher notation of participants' nonverbal behavior has been cited as being central to the reliability, validity, and veracity of qualitative data collection (MacLean et al., 2004, Seale & Silverman, 1997, Wengraf, 2001). Although a few authors advocate the use of selective transcription, there is limited discussion or definition of how this is to actually be achieved (Gilbert, 1993). Within the current literature, authors fail to convincingly

The case against verbatim transcription

The costs associated with interview transcription, in terms of time, physical, and human resources, are significant. Britten (1995) wrote that for every hour of taped interview, 6–7 hours of transcription is required. It is also widely accepted that the process of verbatim transcription is not only time consuming but also complex and fraught with technical dilemmas (Fasick, 2001, Wellard & McKenna, 2001). Whether researchers transcribe the tapes themselves or engage professionals, transcribers

An alternative method of data management

For investigations located in the middle of the spectrum of interview types that do not require a particular closeness between researchers and the verbal interview data, we propose a reflexive, iterative process of data management (Fig. 2). The steps in this process are described in the subsequent subsections.

Implications for further research

It is undeniable that verbal data provide unique and valuable information to the investigation of health care. In spite of the increasing interest in the psychometric testing of patient-reported outcomes, many constructs such as quality of life, anxiety, and depression are inherently difficult to quantify. Furthermore, administration of a psychometric measure infers that a researcher is preempting the constructs and emotions of those under investigation. The implementation of the method

Conclusion

There is limited literature regarding the process of transcription of interview audiorecordings in the health research literature despite a growth in the use of interviews as a method of data collection. As an important step in data management and analysis, the process of transcription must be congruent with the methodological design and theoretical underpinnings of each investigation. Although purist qualitative methodologies inherently require a high level of immersion of researchers in the

References (21)

  • P. Burnard

    The telephone interview as a data collection method

    Nurse Education Today

    (1994)
  • P. Burnard

    Using a database program to handle qualitative data

    Nurse Education Today

    (1994)
  • N. Britten

    Qualitative research: Qualitative interviews in medical research

    British Medical Journal

    (1995)
  • K.L. Easton et al.

    Avoiding common pitfalls in qualitative data collection and transcription

    Qualitative Health Research

    (2000)
  • F.A. Fasick

    Some uses of untranscribed tape recordings in survey research

    Public Opinion Quarterly

    (2001)
  • N. Fielding

    Varieties of research interviews

    Nurse Researcher

    (1994)
  • N. Gilbert

    Researching social life

    (1993)
  • Halcom, E.J., & Andrew, S. (2005). Triangulation as a method for contemporary nursing research. Nurse Researcher (in...
  • J.C. Lapadat et al.

    Transcription in research and practice: From standardisation of technique to interpretative positioning

    Qualitative Inquiry

    (1999)
  • J. Lindsay et al.

    How do transcribers deal with audio recordings of spoken discourse?

    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

    (1995)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (426)

  • Co-designing tourism experience systems: A living lab experiment in reflexivity

    2024, Journal of Destination Marketing and Management
View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Tel.: +61 2 8838 2051; fax: +61 2 9840 3629.

View full text