Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies
Introduction
In quantitative research, generalizability is considered a major criterion for evaluating the quality of a study (Kerlinger and Lee, 2000, Polit and Beck, 2008). Within the classic validity framework of Cook and Campbell (e.g., Shadish et al., 2002), external validity—the degree to which inferences from a study can be generalized—has been a valued standard for decades. Yet, generalizability is a thorny, complex, and illusive issue even in studies that are considered to yield high-quality evidence (Kerlinger and Lee, 2000, Shadish et al., 2002).
In qualitative studies, the issue of generalization is even more complicated, and more controversial. Qualitative researchers seldom worry explicitly about the issue of generalizability. The goal of most qualitative studies is to provide a rich, contextualized understanding of human experience through the intensive study of particular cases. Qualitative researchers do not all agree, however, about the importance or attainability of generalizability. Some challenge the possibility of generalizability in any type of research, be it qualitative or quantitative. In this view, generalization requires extrapolation that can never be fully justified because findings are always embedded within a context. According to this way of thinking, knowledge is idiographic, to be found in the particulars (Guba, 1978, Erlandson et al., 1993). On the other hand, some qualitative researchers believe that in-depth qualitative research is especially well suited for revealing higher-level concepts and theories that are not unique to a particular participant or setting (Glaser, 2002, Misco, 2007). In this view, the rich, highly detailed, and potentially insightful nature of qualitative findings make them especially suitable for extrapolation.
In the current evidence-based practice environment, the issue of the applicability of research findings beyond the particular people who took part in a study has gained importance for qualitative researchers. Groleau et al. (2009), in discussing generalizability in a recent article in Qualitative Health Research, argued that an important goal of qualitative studies is to shape the opinion of decision-makers whose actions affect people's health and well-being. Thorne (2008) echoed similar sentiments about the need to adopt a practical perspective: “…the moral mandate of a practice discipline requires usable general knowledge…(Qualitative) researchers in this field are obliged to consider their findings ‘as if’ they might indeed be applied in practice” (p. 227). Ayres et al. (2003) observed that, “Just as with statistical analysis, the end product of qualitative analysis is a generalization, regardless of the language used to describe it” (p. 881).
Section snippets
Models of generalization
Firestone (1993) developed a typology depicting three models of generalizability that provides a useful framework for considering generalizations in quantitative and qualitative studies. The first model is extrapolating from a sample to a population (statistical generalization), the classical model underpinning most quantitative studies. The second model is analytic generalization, a model that has relevance in both qualitative and quantitative research. The third model is case-to-case
Strategies to enhance generalized inferences
Although it would be impossible to catalogue and discuss the many strategies that could be used to enhance generalization in nursing studies, we offer a few suggestions. Some are appropriate for individual researchers, and others are more global strategies.
Discussion
Generalizability or applicability is an issue of great importance in all forms of health and social research, and this is particularly true in the current environment in which evidence is held in high esteem. Qualitative and quantitative studies have developed their own special ways of dealing with generalization, none of them with perfect success. Arguably though, there are fewer “myths” relating to the analytic generalization and transferability models than to the statistical model of
References (43)
- et al.
Bias in experimental research: strategies to improve the quality and explanatory power of nursing science
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2010) “To be of use”: enhancing the utility of qualitative research
Nursing Outlook
(1997)The role of qualitative research within an evidence-based context: can metasynthesis be the answer
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2009)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
(2010)- et al.
Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis
Qualitative Health Research
(2003) Relabeling internal and external validity for the applied social sciences
Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology
American Psychologist
(1975)Generalizability and the single-case study
The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice
(1998)- et al.
Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods
(1993)
A call for replication
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Accommodation: toward a paradigm-praxis dialectic
Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research
Educational Researcher
Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research: an example using critical interpretive synthesis
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture
Conceptualisation: on theory and theorizing using grounded theory
RE-AIMing research for application: ways to improve evidence for family medicine
Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: design and measurement recommendations
Medical Care
Reform of the social sciences and of universities through action research
Enhancing generalizability: moving from an intimate to a political voice
Qualitative Health Research
Toward a Methodology of Naturalistic Inquiry in Educational Evaluations
Cited by (851)
VISHnu: An approach to support the personalization of self-expressive avatars using context-awareness
2024, International Journal of Human Computer StudiesExperiences, difficulties and coping methods of female nurses caring for breast cancer surgery patients: A qualitative study
2024, European Journal of Oncology NursingInfluence of stakeholders on supply chain social sustainability: New insights from small suppliers in the Indian manufacturing sector
2024, Journal of Cleaner ProductionPedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context
2024, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity