Feedback specificity, information processing, and transfer of training
Introduction
Kluger and DeNisi’s (1996) meta-analytic review of 100 years of feedback research provided a watershed in that it challenged accepted wisdom regarding the effects of feedback and identified limitations in the research conducted until their review. Contrary to the widely accepted view that feedback is both necessary and beneficial, they reported that the observed effects of feedback were about equally likely to have positive, negative, or no effect on performance. They also pointed to the lack of studies examining the causal mechanisms through which feedback influences behavior and performance. Despite its extensive research history, feedback research also has been criticized for its lack of valid, cumulative findings (Annett, 1969, Ilgen et al., 1979, Kluger and DeNisi, 1996) and its many invalid textbook prescriptions (Goodman, Wood, & Hendrickx, 2004).
In response to these criticisms and to increase the field’s understanding of feedback effects, Goodman and Wood (Goodman, 1998, Goodman and Wood, 2004, Goodman and Wood, 2009, Goodman et al., 2004) have built a program of research around the impacts of different feedback properties on training performance and transfer of training, as well as around the mechanisms through which feedback can enhance or inhibit learning and subsequent transfer. Their work is based on motor and cognitive learning literatures that emphasize the guidance function of feedback and suggest that frequent, immediate feedback can provide too much guidance during training (Christina & Bjork, 1991). Consistent with the guidance hypothesis, the results of Goodman and Wood’s studies show that more specific feedback can benefit training performance yet undermine the learning required for transfer of training, particularly learning that requires performers to manage more challenging aspects of a task. As feedback specificity increases, more detailed information is provided on performers’ actions and the locations of their errors (Annett, 1969, Baron, 1988, Goldstein et al., 1968, Payne and Hauty, 1955, Wentling, 1973). Specific feedback may also provide detailed information on corrective actions. For example, less specific feedback may inform performers only of their performance levels or simply that they made errors, whereas high specificity feedback may also identify which actions were correct and incorrect, which actions caused specific errors, and what the correct responses are.
While Goodman and Wood focused on guidance as provided by feedback, guidance can be delivered through many different modes in training and work settings. A parallel body of work, begun by Frese and his colleagues (Dormann and Frese, 1994, Frese and Altmann, 1989) has examined the impacts of the levels of guidance provided by different types of error training (e.g., Gardner and Wood, 2009, Gully et al., 2002, Nordstrom et al., 1998). While the manipulations differ across error training studies, error management training is designed to provide a low level of guidance, and error avoidance training is typically designed to provide a high level of guidance. Similar results have been found in error training and feedback research, despite differences in how guidance is operationalized. Compared to low guidance, providing high guidance during training has been found to have positive or no effects on training performance and negative effects on transfer of training for more challenging tasks that require adaptive transfer of knowledge (Keith & Frese, 2008).
The seemingly contradictory effects of high guidance specific feedback on training performance and transfer of training are partially explained by the impacts of feedback specificity on the extent to which performers spontaneously engage in exploratory behavior (Goodman et al., 2004) and are exposed to different task conditions (Goodman and Wood, 2004, Goodman and Wood, 2009). Exploration and exposure to different task conditions are two distinct but related causal pathways that influence trainees’ exposure to information during training. However, these pathways do not address what trainees actually do with the information to which they are exposed. This is the subject of the current study.
The current study focuses on the learning processes that involve explicit information processing activities such as planning and evaluating actions (Berardi-Coletta et al., 1995, Keith and Frese, 2005), causal reasoning (Isenberg, 1986), and hypothesis testing (Burns and Vollmeyer, 2002, Van der Liden et al., 2003, Van der Linden et al., 2001). We build on previous research by examining explicit information processing as a causal mechanism that helps explain what performers do with the information to which they are exposed during training, and we provide the first direct test of the popular guidance hypothesis claim that high-guidance feedback undermines the information processing needed for transfer (Christina & Bjork, 1991). Extant research has yet to test the assertion that feedback decreases information processing, which is the most proximal determinant of learning. In addition, the theoretical rationale for the guidance hypothesis assertion has not been sufficiently developed. We use the Dual Space Theory of problem solving (Dunbar, 1995, Klahr and Dunbar, 1988, Simon and Lea, 1974) to develop arguments to explain how feedback specificity impacts explicit information processing activities and how explicit information processes contribute to problem solving, learning, and transfer.
We also further explore Goodman and Wood, 2004, Goodman and Wood, 2009 ideas about the effects of differences in the guidance provided by low and high specificity feedback on the extent to which trainees experience different task conditions. These authors (Goodman and Wood, 2004, Goodman and Wood, 2009) found that trainees’ feedback-induced exploratory activities resulted in different levels of exposure to unfavorable conditions, in which trainees experienced the more challenging aspects of the task, and favorable conditions, in which trainees experienced the more straightforward aspects of the task. The rules for correct responses varied across the unfavorable and favorable task conditions. The rules took the form, “If this situation, then this action is appropriate.” Those who received highly specific feedback tended to follow the guidance offered by the feedback and learned how to manage under favorable task conditions, but developed less mastery of the rules for managing unfavorable task conditions. Alternatively, those who received low specificity feedback developed greater mastery of the rules for managing unfavorable task conditions, but acquired less skill for managing favorable task conditions. In the current study we explore how the exposure to different task conditions impacts and interacts with explicit information processes to affect transfer of training. We argue that explicit information processing activities are more vital for transfer the greater the exposure to unfavorable task conditions during training.
The contributions of the current study can be summarized as follows. First, we elaborate the theoretical reasoning for and conduct the first direct test of the guidance hypothesis assertion that high-guidance feedback decreases the information processing needed for transfer of training (Christina & Bjork, 1991). Second, we extend the cumulative body of research on how feedback affects performance and learning (Goodman and Wood, 2004, Goodman and Wood, 2009, Goodman et al., 2004) to include the effects of feedback specificity on the explicit processing of the information that trainees acquire through exploratory behavior and exposure to different task conditions during training. Finally, and more generally, our study responds to the call for the study of training conditions and activities that facilitate adaptive performance (Ford & Weissbein, 1997) by addressing how the content of feedback interventions affects trainees’ ability to perform independently and adapt to changing conditions (Salas & Cannon-Bowers, 2001).
Section snippets
Theory and hypothesis development
In summary, our argument is that the levels of feedback specificity during training will impact trainees’ exposure to different task conditions and their reliance on explicit information processing. In turn, these mechanisms will interact to impact what is learned about the task. This was formally proposed as the moderated mediation model depicted in Fig. 1.
Information processing refers to mental operations performers use to identify and select responses to different task situations. Explicit
Overview and experimental design
We conducted a single-factor experiment with repeated measures. Participants completed a 19-trial training task under one of two nested levels of feedback specificity. They produced “think aloud” verbal protocols while performing the task. We then tested the transfer of the learning that had occurred during training with performance on 14 trials across two transfer tasks, completed two days later, with minimal feedback-provided guidance. Assessments of performance on transfer tasks are free of
Descriptive statistics
Correlations among the study variables and demographic and control variables and total sample and cell means and standard deviations are shown in Table 2. The relationships among the study variables were as expected, and there were few significant relationships among the demographics, controls, and the study variables. Sex was related to transfer, such that men exhibited better favorable task condition rule transfer and women exhibited better unfavorable task condition rule transfer.
Verbal protocol validity
Prior to
Discussion
The results of our study support the argument that the specificity of feedback affects explicit information processing, which has distinct effects on the learning of the rules for performing the task under favorable and unfavorable task conditions.
Feedback specificity was negatively related to the level of explicit information processing participants engaged in during training. This finding supports the strong guidance function of specific feedback and is consistent with the notion that those
References (59)
The interactive effects of task and external feedback on practice performance and learning
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
(1998)- et al.
Dual space search during scientific reasoning
Cognitive Science
(1988) - et al.
On data-limited and resource-limited processes
Cognitive Psychology
(1975) - et al.
The impact of goal specificity on strategy use and the acquisition of problem structure
Cognitive Science
(1996) - et al.
Mechanisms governing organizational performance in complex decision-making environments
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
(1990) Acquisition of cognitive skill
Psychological Review
(1982)Problem solving and learning
American Psychologist
(1993)- et al.
Implications of the ACT-R learning theory: No magic bullets
Feedback and human behavior
(1969)Negative effects of destructive criticism impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance
Journal of Applied Psychology
(1988)
Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Goal specificity effects on hypothesis testing in problem solving
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Optimizing long-term retention and transfer
Error management training: Replication and the function of exploratory behavior
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
The logic of failure: Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations
How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories
Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis
Psychological Methods
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Psychological Review
Verbal reports as data
Psychological Review
Protocol analysis; Verbal reports as data
How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking
Mind, Culture & Activity
Recipient responses to performance feedback: A proposed model and its implications
Transfer of training: An updated review and analysis
Performance Improvement Quarterly
Mood and judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM)
Psychological Bulletin
The treatment of errors in learning and training
Errors, feedback, learning and performance
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Organisational Psychology
Effect of percentage and specificity of feedback on choice behavior in a probabilistic information-processing task
Journal of Applied Psychology
Feedback specificity, learning opportunities, and learning
Journal of Applied Psychology
Cited by (39)
Serious games for managers: Creating cognitive, financial, technological, social, and emotional value in in-service training
2022, Journal of Business ResearchCitation Excerpt :Although the literature recognizes the many pedagogical qualities of serious games, it is essential to develop an interactive playing mode suitable for training and to define precise and measurable learning objectives (Boughzala, 2014). In order to improve the transferability of acquired knowledge and skills, the game must be designed by senior professionnals to include regular assessment and feedback phases, and analysis of successful performance (Goodman, Wood, & Chen, 2011). Learners must understand and discuss their objectives with experts before playing, to improve cognitive value.
Self-Set learning goals and service performance in a gig economy: A Moderated-Mediation role of improvisation and mindful metacognition
2022, Journal of Business ResearchCitation Excerpt :The influx of real-time data informs drivers of current situations, and increases the chances of composing instant cognitive productions while adopting relatively new behaviors based on these productions (Miner & O’Toole, 2020). Learning goals activate the search process for relevant information, such that improvised cognitive productions precede goal-oriented behaviors adapted or developed to master high task performance (Goodman et al., 2011; Wood et al., 2013). For example, Seijts and Latham (2011) reported that learning goals promote the search for and discovery of new behaviors for performing a task that was complex for them.
Leader information seeking, team performance and team innovation: Examining the roles of team reflexivity and cooperative outcome interdependence
2020, Information Processing and ManagementThe role of Sprint planning and feedback in game development projects: Implications for game quality
2019, Journal of Systems and SoftwareCitation Excerpt :Three context-specific items were developed to capture feedback specificity in gameplay tests. Specific feedback refers to a high level of information regarding particular behaviors or locus of errors (Goodman et al., 2011). Content of feedback from game testers was considered and compiled into the metrics.
How temporal and social comparisons in performance evaluation affect fairness perceptions
2018, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision ProcessesCitation Excerpt :However, it does not reflect the social dynamics between the evaluators and employees. Feedback specificity instead pertains to objective rules governing performance evaluations (e.g., “I was given specific feedback about my performance”; Goodman et al., 2011). Therefore, LMX and feedback specificity may not be suitable constructs to capture interpersonal dynamics in performance evaluations.
Improving training for sensory augmentation using the science of expertise
2016, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
- 1
Fax: +1 727 873 4571.