Elsevier

Surgery

Volume 138, Issue 5, November 2005, Pages 829-836
Surgery

Special section: Connecting quality to compensation
Surgeon compensation: “Pay for performance,” the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, the Surgical Care Improvement Program, and other considerations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.015Get rights and content

Section snippets

Developing a quality improvement framework for surgical care

Surgical organizations have long stood for quality and safety. They were among the first to champion peer review reporting in morbidity and mortality conferences, and were at the forefront of developing standards for the facilities in which surgical care is provided. Although surgeons continue to advance evidence-based care, surgical specialists and the research and processes they have developed have largely been omitted from recent debates on ways to report and measure healthcare quality in a

References (8)

  • P. Starr

    The social transformation of American medicine

    (1982)
  • G. Przybylski

    Understanding and applying a resource-based relative value system to your neurosurgical practice

    Neurosurg Focus

    (2002)
  • D. Dranove

    The economic evolution of American health care

    (2000)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (86)

  • Enhanced Recovery Pathways in Pancreatic Surgery

    2016, Surgical Clinics of North America
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text