Consumer assessment of the quality of interpersonal processes of prenatal care among ethnically diverse low-income women: Development of a new measure
Section snippets
Sample and procedures
Medicaid health plans in four San Francisco Bay Area counties (Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco, Santa Clara) in California took part in our study. All plans were owned and operated by local county governments, and most women received care from public clinics and hospitals, though private physicians and clinics did participate in some plans.
African-American, Latino, and Caucasian pregnant women, ages 18 to 44 years, were eligible to participate if they were between 24 and 32 weeks’
Results
Of the original sampling frame, 363 women completed the survey (response rate of 41%). About half (51%) could not be reached because of incorrect telephone contact information or they were not reachable despite repeated attempts (at least three at different times of the day and evening). The response rate among those who were contacted was 81%. Response rates for the different ethnic groups could not be determined because the race/ethnicity of all women listed was not known. About three
Discussion
We developed a 30-item instrument of reports of (PIPC). Seven scales reflect three underlying dimensions: Communication, Patient-Centered Decision Making, and Interpersonal Style. This instrument was tested in women from three racial/ethnic groups (African-American, Latino, Caucasian) using two languages (English and Spanish). The choice of items was guided by a conceptual framework of dimensions of interpersonal processes of care (Stewart et al., 1999). The PIPC instrument appears to be easy
Conclusion
The rise of consumerism, the role of the government as a payer of health services, and an increasingly competitive health care marketplace has increased interest in consumer assessments of providers. The rise of consumerism, the role of the government as a payer of health services, and an increasingly competitive health care marketplace has increased interest in consumer assessments of providers (Marshall, Morales, Elliott, Spritzer, & Hays, 2001). In a review of how quality report cards are
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by a Grant R40MC00137 from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, U.S. DHHS. The authors are grateful to the research team members who were instrumental in survey design and focus group facilitation: Maria Fongwa and Martha Castrillo; and in survey data collection: Adrienne Brown, Martha Castrillo, Phaedra Harris, Constance McCoy, and Thu Quach. We wish to express a special thanks to the health plans and the women who participated in the focus groups and the survey needed
Dr. Wong’s research focuses on psychometric evaluation of measures across diverse populations and examining the determinants of health disparities.
References (44)
- et al.
Mexican-American, black-American and white-American differences in reporting illnesses, disability and physician visits for illnesses
Social Science and Medicine
(1985) - et al.
Differences between black and white women in the use of prenatal care technologies
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
(1994) - et al.
Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical carea meta-analysis
Social Science and Medicine
(1990) - et al.
Prenatal care characteristics and African-American women’s satisfaction with care in a managed care organization
Women’s Health Issues
(2003) - et al.
Racial-ethnic differences in prenatal diagnostic test use and outcomespreferences, socioeconomics, or patient knowledge?
Obstetrics and Gynecology
(1996) - et al.
Comparisons of outcomes of maternity care by obstetricians and certified nurse-midwives
Obstetrics and Gynecology
(1996) The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship
Patient Education Counseling
(2000)- et al.
Patient and physician characteristics associated with perceived quality of care
Family Practice Research Journal
(1993) Translationapplication and research
(1976)999 birth cohort file
(1999)
The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement
British Medical Journal
Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care
Inquiry
Patient-provider communicationeffect of race/ethnicity on process and outcomes of healthcare
Unequal treatmentrole of social and psychological research in medicine
Differences in patient-reported processes and outcomes between men and women with myocardial infarction
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Racial and ethnic disparities in perceptions of physician style and trust
Archives of Family Medicine
Surveying consumer satisfaction to assess managed-care qualitycurrent practices
Health Care Financing and Review
Patients’ participation in medical careeffects of blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Health care characteristics associated with women’s satisfaction with prenatal care
Medical Care
Comprehension of quality care indicatorsdifferences among privately insured, publicly insured, and uninsured
Health Care Financing and Review
Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease
Medical Care
Quality management practices in Medicaid managed carea national survey of Medicaid and commercial health plans participating in the Medicaid program
Journal of the American Medical Association
Cited by (38)
Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring
2019, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyCitation Excerpt :Perception of the quality of prenatal care received was measured at 36 weeks of gestation by a modified validated 30-item Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care scale, which assessed communication, decision making, and interpersonal style. Responses were converted to a 0- to 100-point scale for each sub-scale item, with higher scores indicating higher perceived quality of care.18 Effectiveness of the OB Nest intervention was evaluated by proxy measures including adherence to the ACOG-recommended routine prenatal laboratory services, ultrasound imaging, immunization, and patient education.
Applying the chronic care model to prenatal care: Patient activation, productive interactions, and prenatal outcomes
2018, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :PAM was repeated at time 4 (32-week appointment). Following each appointment, the pregnant women completed five subscales of the validated Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care (PIPC) scale [26], including elicitation/responsiveness to the patient, explanations of care, empowerment, patient-centered decision making, and emotional support. Responses to each item were transformed onto a 0 (negative perception) to 100 (positive perception) scale, and items are averaged to create subscales.
Mobile application as a prenatal education and engagement tool: A randomized controlled pilot
2016, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :Then, they reported how frequently they had used the tool over the past month (1) to look for information and (2) to record information (never = 0, once = 1, weekly = 4, or daily = 28). Following each appointment, patients completed five subscales of the validated Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care (PIPC) scale, including elicitation/responsiveness to the patient, explanations of care, empowerment, patient-centered decision making, and emotional support [12]. Responses to each item were transformed onto a 0 (negative perception) to 100 (positive perception) scale, and items are averaged to create subscales.
A provoking choice-Swedish women's experiences of reactions to their plans to give birth at home
2012, Women and BirthCitation Excerpt :Negatively loaded comments concerning the birthing choice and subsequent risks can influence a woman's mental health during pregnancy29 and can lead to an increase in hurt feelings and decrease in self-confidence.30 To avoid negativism from both the private sphere and health services, the women in this study sought support from other sources – people they knew to have a positive attitude towards home birth, which was earlier described by Darvill et al.28 and Seefat van Teeffelen et al.31 Pregnant women want to receive objective information from the midwife, in a pleasant atmosphere, and they want to make their own choices.31–33 Feeling alienated, thwarted, and threatened because of their home birth choice gives women a sense of guilt, as described by Viisainen.11
Early-life origins of disparities in chronic diseases among Indigenous youth: Pathways to recovering health disparities from intergenerational trauma
2019, Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease
Dr. Wong’s research focuses on psychometric evaluation of measures across diverse populations and examining the determinants of health disparities.
Dr. Korenbrot’s research focuses on developing evidence for effective health policies to improve health of low-income families of diverse racial and ethnic groups by analyzing access, quality and costs of perinatal health care.
Dr. Stewart’s research focuses on methodological issues in understanding and reducing health disparities.