Elsevier

Women's Health Issues

Volume 14, Issue 4, July–August 2004, Pages 118-129
Women's Health Issues

Consumer assessment of the quality of interpersonal processes of prenatal care among ethnically diverse low-income women: Development of a new measure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2004.04.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

Consumer assessments of interpersonal processes of care during prenatal care provide important information about how well clinicians satisfy the perceived needs of the women they serve, but few measures are available that tap the various components of these processes. The purpose of this study is to develop a multidimensional measure of prenatal interpersonal processes of care (PIPC) that demonstrates reliability and validity in ethnically diverse women in Medicaid managed care plans.

Methods

A telephone survey of African American, Latino (U.S. and foreign born) and Caucasian pregnant women in four Medicaid managed care plans in California was conducted in English and Spanish in 2001. Factor analytic methods were used to test the PIPC measures. A psychometric evaluation, including reliability, variability, and construct validity, was conducted with the final scales for the total sample and for each racial/ethnic group.

Results

Three dimensions, Communication, Patient-Centered Decision Making, and Interpersonal Style, with seven scales were supported with 30 items. The scales for each dimension exhibit acceptable reliability for the total sample (Internal Consistency Reliability ranged from 0.66 to 0.85) and for all racial/ethnic groups. All scales had significant associations with satisfaction with prenatal care and explained considerable variation in satisfaction (19–43%). The scale qualities and validity associations held for all scales and ethnic groups except some scales for U.S.-born Latinas.

Conclusions

The multidimensional PIPC measure for assessing what actually happens between providers and low-income pregnant women of diverse ethnic groups demonstrates acceptable reliability and construct validity.

Section snippets

Sample and procedures

Medicaid health plans in four San Francisco Bay Area counties (Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco, Santa Clara) in California took part in our study. All plans were owned and operated by local county governments, and most women received care from public clinics and hospitals, though private physicians and clinics did participate in some plans.

African-American, Latino, and Caucasian pregnant women, ages 18 to 44 years, were eligible to participate if they were between 24 and 32 weeks’

Results

Of the original sampling frame, 363 women completed the survey (response rate of 41%). About half (51%) could not be reached because of incorrect telephone contact information or they were not reachable despite repeated attempts (at least three at different times of the day and evening). The response rate among those who were contacted was 81%. Response rates for the different ethnic groups could not be determined because the race/ethnicity of all women listed was not known. About three

Discussion

We developed a 30-item instrument of reports of (PIPC). Seven scales reflect three underlying dimensions: Communication, Patient-Centered Decision Making, and Interpersonal Style. This instrument was tested in women from three racial/ethnic groups (African-American, Latino, Caucasian) using two languages (English and Spanish). The choice of items was guided by a conceptual framework of dimensions of interpersonal processes of care (Stewart et al., 1999). The PIPC instrument appears to be easy

Conclusion

The rise of consumerism, the role of the government as a payer of health services, and an increasingly competitive health care marketplace has increased interest in consumer assessments of providers. The rise of consumerism, the role of the government as a payer of health services, and an increasingly competitive health care marketplace has increased interest in consumer assessments of providers (Marshall, Morales, Elliott, Spritzer, & Hays, 2001). In a review of how quality report cards are

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by a Grant R40MC00137 from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, U.S. DHHS. The authors are grateful to the research team members who were instrumental in survey design and focus group facilitation: Maria Fongwa and Martha Castrillo; and in survey data collection: Adrienne Brown, Martha Castrillo, Phaedra Harris, Constance McCoy, and Thu Quach. We wish to express a special thanks to the health plans and the women who participated in the focus groups and the survey needed

Dr. Wong’s research focuses on psychometric evaluation of measures across diverse populations and examining the determinants of health disparities.

References (44)

  • P. Cleary

    The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement

    British Medical Journal

    (1999)
  • P.D. Cleary et al.

    Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care

    Inquiry

    (1988)
  • L. Cooper et al.

    Patient-provider communicationeffect of race/ethnicity on process and outcomes of healthcare

    Unequal treatmentrole of social and psychological research in medicine

    (2002)
  • K. Covinsky et al.

    Differences in patient-reported processes and outcomes between men and women with myocardial infarction

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    (2000)
  • M. Doescher et al.

    Racial and ethnic disparities in perceptions of physician style and trust

    Archives of Family Medicine

    (2000)
  • F.J. Fowler
  • M. Gold et al.

    Surveying consumer satisfaction to assess managed-care qualitycurrent practices

    Health Care Financing and Review

    (1995)
  • S. Greenfield et al.

    Patients’ participation in medical careeffects of blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    (1988)
  • A. Handler et al.

    Health care characteristics associated with women’s satisfaction with prenatal care

    Medical Care

    (1998)
  • J. Jewett et al.

    Comprehension of quality care indicatorsdifferences among privately insured, publicly insured, and uninsured

    Health Care Financing and Review

    (1996)
  • S.H. Kaplan et al.

    Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease

    Medical Care

    (1989)
  • B.E. Landon et al.

    Quality management practices in Medicaid managed carea national survey of Medicaid and commercial health plans participating in the Medicaid program

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1999)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring

      2019, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Perception of the quality of prenatal care received was measured at 36 weeks of gestation by a modified validated 30-item Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care scale, which assessed communication, decision making, and interpersonal style. Responses were converted to a 0- to 100-point scale for each sub-scale item, with higher scores indicating higher perceived quality of care.18 Effectiveness of the OB Nest intervention was evaluated by proxy measures including adherence to the ACOG-recommended routine prenatal laboratory services, ultrasound imaging, immunization, and patient education.

    • Applying the chronic care model to prenatal care: Patient activation, productive interactions, and prenatal outcomes

      2018, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      PAM was repeated at time 4 (32-week appointment). Following each appointment, the pregnant women completed five subscales of the validated Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care (PIPC) scale [26], including elicitation/responsiveness to the patient, explanations of care, empowerment, patient-centered decision making, and emotional support. Responses to each item were transformed onto a 0 (negative perception) to 100 (positive perception) scale, and items are averaged to create subscales.

    • Mobile application as a prenatal education and engagement tool: A randomized controlled pilot

      2016, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      Then, they reported how frequently they had used the tool over the past month (1) to look for information and (2) to record information (never = 0, once = 1, weekly = 4, or daily = 28). Following each appointment, patients completed five subscales of the validated Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care (PIPC) scale, including elicitation/responsiveness to the patient, explanations of care, empowerment, patient-centered decision making, and emotional support [12]. Responses to each item were transformed onto a 0 (negative perception) to 100 (positive perception) scale, and items are averaged to create subscales.

    • A provoking choice-Swedish women's experiences of reactions to their plans to give birth at home

      2012, Women and Birth
      Citation Excerpt :

      Negatively loaded comments concerning the birthing choice and subsequent risks can influence a woman's mental health during pregnancy29 and can lead to an increase in hurt feelings and decrease in self-confidence.30 To avoid negativism from both the private sphere and health services, the women in this study sought support from other sources – people they knew to have a positive attitude towards home birth, which was earlier described by Darvill et al.28 and Seefat van Teeffelen et al.31 Pregnant women want to receive objective information from the midwife, in a pleasant atmosphere, and they want to make their own choices.31–33 Feeling alienated, thwarted, and threatened because of their home birth choice gives women a sense of guilt, as described by Viisainen.11

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Dr. Wong’s research focuses on psychometric evaluation of measures across diverse populations and examining the determinants of health disparities.

    Dr. Korenbrot’s research focuses on developing evidence for effective health policies to improve health of low-income families of diverse racial and ethnic groups by analyzing access, quality and costs of perinatal health care.

    Dr. Stewart’s research focuses on methodological issues in understanding and reducing health disparities.

    View full text