Skip to main content
Log in

Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BioWorld is a computer learning environmentdesigned for high school biology students. BioWorldcomplements the biology curriculum by providing ahospital simulation where students can apply what theyhave learned about body systems to problems where theycan reason about diseases. Students workcollaboratively at collecting evidence to confirm orrefute their hypotheses as they attempt to solveBioWorld cases. The present study examined students'use of BioWorld to solve problems related to thedigestive system. Analyses of student actions andverbal dialogue were conducted to pinpoint the typesof features within BioWorld that were most conduciveto learning and scientific reasoning. An exploratoryanalysis of the types of assistance provided tostudents by a teacher, researcher, and BioWorld alonewas conducted to examine how scaffolding influencedstudent actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. D.C.: AAAS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (in prep). Resources for scientific literacy: Curriculum materials. (American Association for the Advancement of Science Project No. 2061).

  • Amsel, E. & Brock, S. (1996). The development of evidence evaluation skills. Cognitive Development 11: 523–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (1993). Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. & Bernard, R.M. (1995). A meta-analysis of the effect of feedback in computerbased instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research 13(2): 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B.J.S., Schwartz, D.L. Vye, N.J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J.D. & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 7(3&4): 271–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H.S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education 20: 481–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H.S. & Myers, A.C. (in prep.). Problem-based learning: A total approach to education. In H. Barrows & A. Kelson, eds, Problem-Based Learning.

  • Brown, A.L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist 52(4): 399–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, R.H., Schraw, G.J. & Ronning, R.R. (1995). Cognitive Psychology and Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadigan, J.J. (1993). The making of a scientist or engineer. In R. Ruopp, S. Gal, B. Drayton & M. Pfister, eds, LabNet: Toward a Community of Practice, pp. 200–204. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 6(3): 271–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R. & Farr, M. (1988). The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1997). National science educational standards: Looking backward and forward. The Elementary School Journal 97(4): 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J.S. & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics, In L.B. Resnick, ed., Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, pp. 453–494. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, T. & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research 68(2): 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J. (1998). Epilogue: Linking metacognitive theory to education. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A.C. Graesser, eds, Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, pp. 367–381. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist 41: 1040–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34: 906–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, C.H., Roy, M. & Bedard, D. (1995). Discourse processing in situated learning: Learning through tutorial dialogue in a complex domain. In J.D. Moore & J.F. Lehman, eds, Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 643–647. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S.A., Stepien, W.J., Sher, B.T. & Workman, D. (1995). Implementing problembased learning in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics 95: 136–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galotti, K.M. (1989). Approaches to informal and everyday reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 105(3): 331–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. & Person, N. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal 31(1): 104–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, D.J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A.C. Graesser, eds, Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, pp. 1–23. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haury, D.L. (1993). Teaching Science Through Inquiry. Columbus, OH: Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education (ERIC Reproduction Document No. ED 359 048).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemple, C. (1961). Philosophy of Natural Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. & Ritchie, D. (1997). Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problembased learning. Instructional Science 25: 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.A. & Lawson, A.E. (1998). What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(1): 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H. (1996). Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H. & Reeves, T.C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D.H. Jonassen, ed., Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 693–719. NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klahr, D., Fay, A.L. & Dunbar, K. (1993). Heuristics for scientific experimentation: A developmental study. Cognitive Psychology 25: 111–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kommers, P., Jonassen, D.H. & Mayes T., eds (1992). Cognitive Tools for Learning. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T.D., Myers, A.C., Feltovich, P.J. & Barrows, H.S. (1994). Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3(3): 227–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Amsel, E. & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review 36(4): 674–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1997). Constraints or guideposts? Developmental psychology and science education. Review of Educational Research 67(1): 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Shaw, V. & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction 15(3): 287–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S.P. (1991). Reality testing for cognitive strategy research. Educational Researcher 20(3): 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S.P. (1993). Computer environments as cognitive tools for enhancing learning. In S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry, eds, Computers as Cognitive Tools, pp. 261–288. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S.P., ed. (in press). Computers as Cognitive Tools II: No More Walls: Theory Change, Paradigm Shifts and Their Influence on the Use of Computers for Instructional Purposes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Lajoie, S.P. & Derry, S.J., eds. (1993). Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S.P., Greer, J.E., Munsie, S.D., Wilkie, T.V., Guerrera. C. & Aleong, P. (1995). Establishing an argumentation environment to foster scientific reasoning with Bio-World. In D. Jonassen & G. McCalla, eds, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 89–96. Charlottesville VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S.P., Munsie, S.D. & Lavigne, N.C. (1996, April). Examining the relationship between evidence and argumentation in Bio-World. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York, NY.

  • Leach, J. (1997, March). Students' understanding of the coordination of theory and evidence in science. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.

  • Lepper, M.R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D.L. & Gutner, J. (1993). Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry, eds, Computers as Cognitive Tools, pp. 75–106. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesgold, A. (1988). Problem solving. In R. Sternberg & E. Smith, eds, The Psychology of Human Thought, pp. 188–21. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M.C. (1992). Science education: Building on the research base. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29: 821–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, F. (1995). Intellectual skills and cognitive strategies: Can one method tutor both? In J. Greer, ed., Proceedings of the World Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, pp. 445–452. Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (1983). Thinking, Problem Solving and Cognition. NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science 26: 40–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCade, J. (1995). Educational reform and technology education. The Technology Teacher 54: 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, M.L. & Voss, J.F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction 14(2): 139–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, D., Reiser, B., Merrill, S. & Landes, S. (1995). Tutoring: Guided learning by doing. Cognition and Instruction 13(3): 315–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, D., Reiser, B., Ranney, M. & Trafton, J.G. (1992). Effective tutoring techniques: A comparison of human tutors and Intelligent Tutoring Systems. The Journal for the Learning Sciences 2(3): 277–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, K.E. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's science instruction. Review of Educational Research 65: 93–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, K.E. (1997). On the complex relation between cognitive developmental research and children's science curricula. Review of Educational Research 67(1): 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (1994). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1995). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association (1996). Pathways to Science Education Standards. Arlington, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T.O. (1999). Cognition versus metacognition. In R.J. Sternberg, ed., The Nature of Cognition, pp. 625–641. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens, eds, Mental Models, pp. 7–14. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, T. & Simon, H.A. (1997). Collaborative discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science 21(2): 109–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R.D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist,20: 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D.N. (1985). The fingertip effect: How information processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher 14: 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polman, J. & Pea, R.D. (1997, March). Transformative communication in project science learning discourse. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.

  • Resnick, L.B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher 16: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L.B., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C.M., Wathen, S.H. & Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction 11(3&4): 347–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. & McGinn, M.K. (1997). Graphing: Cognitive ability or practice? Science Education 81(1): 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.M., McGinn, M.K. & Bowen, B.M. (1996). Applications of science and technology studies: Effecting change in science education. Science Technology and Human Values 21: 454–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rysavy, D.M. & Sales, G.C. (1991). Cooperative learning in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research amd Development 39(2): 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., Perkins, D.N. & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher 20: 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R.A., Schulze, S. & John, J. (1995). Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(2): 131–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A.H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher 28(7): 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science 26: 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research 50: 241–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, E.J. & Weissberg-Benchell, J.A. (1989). The triple alliance for learning: Cognition, metacognition, and motivation. In C.B. McCormick, G. E. Miller, M. Pressley, eds, Cognitive Strategy Research, pp. 33–63. NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V.J. (1993). A comparison of learning environments: All that glitters. In S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry, eds, Computers as Cognitive Tools, pp. 47–74. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V.J. & Glaser, R. (1990). A large-scale evaluation of an intelligent discovery world: Smithtown. Interactive Learning Environments 1: 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V.J., Lajoie, S.P. & Gluck, K. (in press). Individual and group approaches to training. In S. Tobias & H. O'Neill, eds, Handbook on Training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Slavin, R.E. (1990a). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1990b). Research on cooperative learning: Consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership (December 1989/January 1990) 47: 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodian, B. (1997, March). Young children's ability to test their own causal beliefs. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.

  • Snow, R.E. (1989). Toward assessment of cognitive and conative structures in learning. Educational Researcher 18(9): 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (1998). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an expert student? Instructional Science 26: 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D., Weiner, A., Connolly, J. & Paolucci, M. (1995). Belvedere: Engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. In J. Greer, ed., Proceedings of the World Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, pp. 266–273. Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Kahle, J.B. & Fraser, B.J., eds (1990). Windows into Science Classrooms: Problems Associated with Higher-Level Cognitive Learning. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.

  • van Joolingen, W.R. & de Jong, T. (1997). An extended dual search space model of scientific discovery learning. Instructional Science 25: 307–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Joolingen, W.R. & de Jong, T. (1991). Supporting hypothesis generation by learners exploring an interactive computer simulation. Instructional Science 20: 359–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (1997, March). Scientific dialogue as evidence of learning. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.

  • Winne, P.H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 89(3): 397–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C.A. & Pintrich, P.R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science 26: 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne P. Lajoie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lajoie, S.P., Guerrera, C., Munsie, S.D. et al. Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld. Instructional Science 29, 155–186 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003996000775

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003996000775

Navigation