Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MicroCog: Assessment of Cognitive Functioning

  • Published:
Neuropsychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MicroCog: Assessment of Cognitive Functioning version 2.1 (Powell, D. H., Kaplan, E. F., Whitla, D., Catlin, R., and Funkenstein, H. H. (1993). The Psychological corporation, San Antonio, TX.) is one of the first computerized assessment batteries commercially developed to detect early signs of cognitive impairment. This paper reviews its psychometric characteristics and relates them to its clinical utility. It concludes that MicroCog provides an accurate, cost-effective screen for early dementia among elderly subjects living in the community and that it can distinguish dementia from depression. Its ability to detect cognitive decline at other ages or to discriminate dementia from other mental disorders has not been established. MicroCog measures different constructs than do traditional neuropsychological tests, making it difficult to relate test performance to current models of cognitive functioning. The review recommends further development of MicroCog and discusses its implications for the future of computer-based neuropsychological assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Baddeley, A. (1990). Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, N., and Jolles, J. (1985). Learning and retrieval rate of words presented auditorily and visually. Journal of General Psychology 112: 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 10: 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. C., Woods, R. T., and Moore, B. J. (1986). Automated cognitive assessment of elderly patients: A comparison of two types of response device. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 25: 305, 306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannenbaum, S. E., Parkinson, S. R., and Inman, V. W. (1988). Short-term forgetting: Comparisons between patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type, depressed, and normal elderly. Cognitive Neuropsychology 5: 213–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFilippis, N. A. (1993). Category Test: Computer Version, Research Edition [computer program], Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., and Ober, B. A. (1987). California Verbal Learning Test. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devivo, K., Rothland, J., Price, L., and Fein, G. (1997). Computerized assessment of arithmetic computation skills with MicroCog [Letter to the editor]. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 3: 199–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sclafani, V., Clark, H. W., Tolou-Shams, M., Bloomer, C. W., Salas, G. A., Norman, D., and Fein, G. (1998). Premorbid brain size is a determinant of functional reserve in abstinent crack-cocaine and crack-cocaine-alcohol-dependent adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 4: 559–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, A., and Murdock, B. B. (1980). The role of auditory features in memory span for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning 6: 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagle, M., and Leiter, E. (1964). Recall and recognition in intentional and incidental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 68: 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, R. W. (1991). The Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised: Psychometric characteristics and clinical application. Neuropsychology Review 2: 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, R. W. (1993). Clinical discriminations and neuropsychological tests: An appeal to Bayes' theorem. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 7: 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, R. W. (1995). The California Verbal Learning Test: Psychometric characteristics and clinical application. Neuropsychology Review 5: 173–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, R. W. (1998). MicroCog: A computer-administered clinical assessment of cognitive functions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Neuropsychological Group, Milwaukee, WI, May 1998.

  • Freedman, M., Leach, L., Kaplan, E., Winocur, G., Shulman, K. I., and Delis, D. C. (1994). Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, S. W., and Parsons, O. A. (1991). Effects of alcoholism and instructional conditions on speed/accuracy tradeoffs. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 15: 612–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. C., Green, J., Harrison, J. M., and Kutner, M. H. (1994). Screening for cognitive impairment in older individuals: Validation of a computer-based test. Archives of Neurology 51: 779–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. L. (1992). Human Memory: Paradigms and Paradoxes, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, D. E., Haywood, T. W., Sivan, A. B., and Kravitz, H. M. (1999). Sensitivity of MicroCog in assessing cognitive impairment among impaired professionals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA, August 1999.

  • Heaton, R. K. (1988). WCST: Computer Version-2 Research Edition [computer program], Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. L., and Kay, G. G. (1992). Computerized assessment in neuropsychology: A review of tests and test batteries. Neuropsychology Review 3: 1–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. L., and Kay, G. G. (1997). Computer applications in neuropsychological assessment. In Goldstein, G. and Incagnoli, T. (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Neuropsychological Assessment, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., and Kaufman, N. L. (1983). K-ABC: Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledbetter, M. F., and Trippel, T. (1994). An evaluation of speed and accuracy of neurocognitive processing in a group of Alzheimer patients and matched normal controls. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, Orlando, FL, November 1994.

  • Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological Assessment (3rd edn.), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katsman, R., Price, D., and Stadlan, E. M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group. Neurology 34: 939–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. G. (1986). Short-term forgetting in senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Cognitive Neuropsychology 3: 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. G. (1987). Articulatory rehearsal in Alzheimer type dementia. Brain and Language, 30: 351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. G., and Baddeley, A. D. (1988). Primary and working memory functioning in Alzheimer-type dementia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 10: 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B. (1968). Modality effects in short-term memory: Storage or retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77: 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, C. G. (1989a). Modality effects in delayed free recall and recognition: Visual is better than auditory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 41: 455–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, C. G. (1989b). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory and Cognition 17: 398–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, C. G., and Godsell, A. (1999). Unusual modality effects in less-skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25: 284–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, L. R., and Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58: 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D. H., and Hiatt, M. D. (1996). Auditory and visual recall of forward and backward digit spans. Perceptual and Motor Skills 82: 1099–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D. H., Kaplan, E. F., Whitla, D., Weintraub, S., Catlin, R., and Funkenstein, H. H. (1993). Microcog: Assessment of Cognitive Functioning (Version 2.1) [Computer software], The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D. H., Kaplan, E. F., Whitla, D., Weintraub, S., Catlin, R., and Funkenstein, H. H. (1996). Microcog: Assessment of Cognitive Functioning (Version 2.4) [Computer software], The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D. H. (1997). Comment on computerized assessment of arithmetic computation skills with MicroCog [Letter to the editor]. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 3: 200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, M. C., and Reynolds, C. R. (1995). Separate digit tests: A brief history, a literature review, and a reexamination of the factor structure of the Test of Memory and Learning (TOMAL). Neuropsychology Review, 5: 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smigielski, J. S., and Doss, R. C. (1997, November). MicroCog: Use in an inpatient substance abuse treatment setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, Las Vegas, NV.

  • Solomon, P. R., Hirschoff, A., Kelly, B., Relin, M., Brush, M., DeVeaux, R. D., and Pendlebury, W. W. (1998). A 7 minute neurocognitive screening battery highly sensitive to Alzheimer's disease. Archives of Neurology 55: 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., and Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (2nd edn.), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, T., Hill, J. L., Mellow, A. M., Lawlor, B. A., Gundersheimer, J., Newhouse, P. A., and Grafman, J. H. (1989). Clock drawing in Alzheimer's disease: A novel measure of dementia severity. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 37: 725–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommer, B. L., Hoeppner, J. B., Lorber, R., and Armstrong, K. J. (1988). The go-no-go paradigm in attention deficit disorder. Annals of Neurology 24: 610–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler Memory-Revised, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997a). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997b). Wechsler Memory-Third Edition, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weins, A. N., Tindall, A. G., and Crossen, J. R. (1994). The California Verbal Learning Test: A normative study. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8: 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). WRAT-3: Wide Range Achievement Test, Wide Range Achievement, Wilmington, DE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. (1991) MAS Memory Assessment Scales, Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf-Klein, G. P., Silverstone, F. A., Levy, A. P., and Brod, M. S. (1989). Screening for Alzheimer's disease by clock drawing. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 37: 730–734.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Veterans Affairs Medical Center Tomah, Wisconsin;, 48 MDOS/SGOH, RAF Lakenheath, United Kingdom

    Richard W. Elwood

Authors
  1. Richard W. Elwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elwood, R.W. MicroCog: Assessment of Cognitive Functioning. Neuropsychol Rev 11, 89–100 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016671201211

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016671201211

Search

Navigation