Skip to main content
Log in

Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To analyse selective factors associated with an unexpectedly low response rate. Subjects and methods: The baseline questionnaire survey of a large prospective follow-up study on the psychosocial health of the Finnish working-aged randomly chosen population resulted in 21,101 responses (40.0%) in 1998. The non-respondent analysis used demographic and health-related population characteristics from the official statistics and behavioural, physical and mental health-related outcome differences between early and late respondents to predict possible non-response bias. Reasons for non-response, indicated by missing responses of late respondents, and factors affecting the giving of consent were also analysed. Results: The probability of not responding was greater for men, older age groups, those with less education, divorced and widowed respondents, and respondents on disability pension. The physical health-related differences between the respondents and the general population were small and could be explained by differences in definitions. The late respondents smoked and used more psychopharmaceutical drugs than the early ones, suggesting similar features in non-respondents. The sensitive issues had a small effect on the response rate. The consent to use a medical register-based follow-up was obtained from 94.5% of the early and 90.9% of the late respondents (odds ratio: 1.70; 95% confidence interval: 1.49–1.93). Consent was more likely among respondents reporting current smoking, heavy alcohol use, panic disorder or use of tranquillisers. Conclusions: The main reasons for non-response may be the predisposing sociodemographic and behavioural factors, the length and sensitive nature of the questionnaire to some extent, and a suspicion of written consent and a connection being made between the individual and the registers mentioned on the consent form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50(10): 1129–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Helakorpi S, Uutela A, Prättälä R, Puska P. Health Behaviour among Finnish Adult Population, Spring 1999 (in Finnish, English abstract). Publications of the National PublicHealth Institute B19/1999.

  3. Cottler LB, Zipp JF, Robins LN, Spitznagel EL. Difficult-to-recruit respondents and their effect on prevalence estimates in an epidemiologic survey. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 125: 329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobsen BK, Thelle DS. The Tromsø Heart Study: Responders and non-responders to a health questionnaire, do they differ? Scand J Soc Med 1988; 16(2): 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bakke P, Gulsvik A, Lilleng P, Overå O, Hanoa R, Eide GE. Postal survey on airborne occupational exposure and respiratory disorders in Norway: Causes and consequences of non-response. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1990; 44: 316–320.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jooste PL, Yach D, Steenkamp HJ, Botha JL, Rossouw JE. Drop-out and newcomer bias in a community cardiovascular follow-up study. Int J Epidemiol 1990; 19(2): 284–289.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brussaard JH, Brants HA, Bouman M, Lowik MR. The study population: General characteristics and potential confounding factors. Eur J Clin Nutr 1997; 51(Suppl 3): S19–S24.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rönmark E, Lundqvist A, Lundbäck B, Nyström L. Non-responders to a postal questionnaire on respiratory symptoms and diseases. Eur J Epidemiol 1999; 15(3): 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Macera CA, Jackson KL, Davis DR, Kronenfeld JJ, Blair SN. Patterns of non-response to a mail survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43(12): 1427–1430.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Etter J-F, Perneger TV. Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50(10): 1123–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Metsemakers JF, Knottnerus JA. Morbidity in responders and nonresponders in a register-based population survey. Fam Pract 1998; 15(3): 261–263.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sonne-Holm S, Sørensen TIA, Jensen G, Schnohr P. Influence of fatness, intelligence, education and sociodemographicfac tors on response rate in a health survey. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1989; 43: 369–374.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobsen BK, Stensvold I, Fylkesnes K, Schnohr P. The Nordland Health Study. Design of the study, description of the population, attendance and questionnaire response. Scand J Soc Med 1992; 20(3): 184–187.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barton J, Bain C, Hennekens CH, et al. Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents to a mailed questionnaire. Am J PublicHealth 1980; 70(8): 823–825.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boström G, Hallqvist J, Haglund BJ, Romelsjö A, Svanström L, Diderichsen F. Socioeconomic differences in smoking in an urban Swedish population. The bias introduced by non-participation in a mailed questionnaire. Scand J Soc Med 1993; 21(2): 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Forthofer RN. Investigation of non-response bias in NHANES II. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 117(4): 507–515.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Foster K, Campbell D, Crum J, Stove M. Non-response in a population study after an environmental disaster. PublicHealth 1995; 109: 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Janzon L, Hanson BS, Isacsson S-O, Lindell S-E, Steen B. Factors influencing participation in health surveys. Results from prospective population study ‘Men born in 1914’ in Malmö, Sweden. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1986; 40: 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Subar AF, Ziegler RG, Thompson FE, et al. Is shorter always better? Relative importance of questionnaire length and cognitive ease on response rates and data quality for two dietary questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153(4): 404–409.

    Google Scholar 

  20. King KA, Pealer LN, Bernard AL. Increasing response rates to mail questionnaires: A review of inducement strategies. Am J Health Educ 2001; 32: 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dunne MP, Martin NG, Bailey JM, et al. Participation bias in a sexuality survey: Psychological and behavioural characteristics of responders and non-responders. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26(4): 844–854.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tennant A, Badley EM. A confidence interval approach to investigating non-response bias and monitoring response to postal questionnaires. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1991; 45(1): 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pullen E, Nutbeam D, Moore L. Demographicc haracteristics and health behaviours of consenters to medical examination. Results from the Welsh Heart Health Survey. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1992; 46: 455–459.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Howe A. Refusal of videorecording: What factors may in.uence patient consent? Fam Pract 1997; 14: 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Mayrent SL (eds) Epidemiology in medicine. Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sheikh K, Mattlingly S. Investigating non-response bias in mail surveys. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1981; 35: 293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Statistical Yearbook of Finland 1999. Hämeenlinna: Statistics Finland, 1999.

  28. Tuomilehto J, Puska P, Virtamo K, Salonen J, Koskela K. The levels of the major risk indicators of cardiovascular diseases in Eastern Finland prior to a community-based intervention programme (The North Karelia project). Acta Cardiol 1979; 34(6): 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, Langinvainio H, Rita H, Sarna S. Psychosocial Factors and Morbidity: Hospitalization and Mortality in the Finnish Twin Cohort. BasicTabulations of a Six Year Follow-up of 31,116 Finnish Adults. Helsinki: Department of PublicHealth, University of Helsinki, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Aromaa A, Heliövaara M, Impivaara O, et al. Health, functional limitations and need for care in Finland. Basicresults from the Mini-Finland health survey (in Finnish, English summary,) Vol. 32, Helsinki/Turku: Publications of the Social Insurance Institution, AL, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Henkilötietolaki 523/1999 (The Personal Data Act 523/ 1999 in Finnish). Statutes of Finland, 1999.

  32. Erityiskorvattaviin lääkkeisiin oikeuttavat sairaudet 1998 (Specified illnesses entitling to special reimbursement of medicines in 1998 in Finnish). Helsinki: The Social Insurance Institution, 1999.

  33. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiat 1961; 4: 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Koskenvuo M, Kaprio J, Rose RJ, et al. Hostility as a risk factor for mortality and ischemic heart disease in men. Psychosom Med 1988; 50: 330–340.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Volume II – The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies. Lyon: IARC, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Second Edition, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lawlor DA, Stone T. Publichealth and data protection: An inevitable collision or potential for a meeting of minds? Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30: 1221–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Boersma F, Eefsting JA, van den Brink W, van Tilburg W. Characteristics of non-responders and the impact of non-response on prevalence estimates of dementia. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26(5): 1055–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Silverbåge Carlsson G, Svörsudd K. Comparison of participants and non-participants in a population study of injuries. The study of men born in 1913 and 1923. Scand J Soc Med 1985; 13: 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korkeila, K., Suominen, S., Ahvenainen, J. et al. Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey. Eur J Epidemiol 17, 991–999 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020016922473

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020016922473

Navigation