Abstract
What is the status of empirical contributions to bioethics, especially to clinical bioethics? Where is the empirical approach discussed in bioethics related to the ongoing debate about principlism versus casuistry? Can we consider an integrative model of research in medical ethics and which empirical methodology could then be valuable, the quantitative or the qualitative? These issues will be addressed in the first, theoretical part of the paper. The concept of the “embedded researcher” presented in this article was stimulated by the two questions, (1) how can we safeguard that our research will yield valid and meaningful results to practice? and (2), how can we convince clinical colleagues that medical ethics offers relevant contributions to the analysis and solution of problems? One tentative answer has been our effort to elaborate a coherent methodological research approach in the field of end-of-life issues integrating qualitative and quantitative as well as casuistic methodologies. This development is characterized in the second part describing the ECOPE Study (short title)“Ethical Conditions Of Passive Euthanasia.” The achievements and limitations of the suggested approach of the “embedded researcher” are discussed referring to 3 examples of our joint studies about ethical issues concerning(1) critical decision-making in neonatology(2) limitation of treatment in intensive care(3) problems with doctor-patient conversation at the end of life in oncologyConclusions from our studies are put to discussion in the final part of the paper about how to further develop research in the field of end-of-life care and, maybe,clinical bioethics as a whole.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, H.: 2000, Kritischer Rationalismus. Vier Kapitel zur Kritik illusionaeren Denkens. Tuebingen: UTB Mohr Siebeck.
Beck, S.: 2002, The rapiebegrenzung auf Internistischen Intensivstationen. Eine Interviewstudie über ethische Fragen zu Unterlassung und Abbruch maschineller Beatmung. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg, supervised by Prof. Dr. Stella Reiter-Theil and PD Dr. Andreas van de Loo.
Birnbacher, D.: 1993, ‘Welche Ethik ist als Bioethik tauglich?’, in: J.S. Ach and A. Gaidt (eds.), Herausforderung der Bioethik. Problemata. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstadt: Frommannholzboog.
Bockenheimer-Lucius, G.: 1995, ‘Wechsel in der Geschaeftsfuehrung der Akademie fuer Ethik in der Medizin’, Ethik Med 8, 107–109.
Chandros Hull, S., H.A. Taylor and N. Kass: 2001, ‘Qualitative Methods’, in: J. Sugarman and D.P. Sulmasy (eds.), Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Dalla-Vorgia, P., S.A. Mason, C. Megone, P.J. Allmark, D. Bratlid, A.B. Gill, P. Morrogh, A. Plomer and S. Reiter-Theil: 2001, ‘Obtaining Informed Consent for Neonatal Research’, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 84, F70–F73.
Dickenson, D.: 2000, ‘Are Medical Ethicists out of Touch?’, Journal of Medical Ethics 26, 254–260.
Dilthey, W.: 1883, Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften/“Introduction to the Social Sciences”. Gesammelte Schriften/“Collected Writings.”
Fahr, W. and S. Reiter-Theil: 2003, ‘Von der Anekdote zur Methode. Wie können wir zu einem systematischen Vorgehen in der (medizin)ethischen Fallanalyse gelangen?’, in: K. Amelung and W. Beulke et al. (eds.), Strafrecht — Biorecht — Rechtsphilosophie. Festschrift für Hans-Ludwig Schreiber. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag, pp. 669–684.
Kuczewski, M.: 1998. ‘Casuistry Versus Principlism: The Convergence in Method in Biomedical Ethics’, Theoretical Medicine 19(6), 509–524.
Lindner, K. and S. Reiter-Theil: 2002, ‘Ethics in Neonatal Intensive Care. Critical Decision Making About Limitation and Termination of Treatment’, Abstract, ESPMH (European Society for Philosophy in Medicine and Health Care), Malta, 24.8.2002 (publication in preparation).
Mason, S.A., P.J. Allmark, C. Megone, D. Bratlid, P. Dalla-Vorgia, A.B. Gill, P. Morrogh and S. Reiter-Theil: 2000, ‘Obtaining Informed Consent to Neonatal Randomized Controlled Trials: Interviews with Parents and Clinicians in the Euricon Study’, The Lancet 356, 2045–2051.
Mason, S. and C. Megone (eds.): 2001, European Neonatal Research. Consent, Ethics, Committees and Law. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Pearlman, R.A. and H. Starks: 2001, ‘Quantitative Surveys’, in: J. Sugarman and D.P. Sulmasy (eds.), Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Reichlin, M.: 1994, ‘Observations on the Epistemological Status of Bioethics’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19, 79–105.
Reiter-Theil, S.: 1998a, ‘Answers to Change: The Problem of Paradigm Shift in Medical Ethics from the German Perspective’, in: U. Troehler and S. Reiter-Theil (eds.), Ethics Codes in Medicine. Foundations and Achievements Since 1947. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 257–269.
Reiter-Theil, S.: 1998b, ‘Voice of the Patient. Experiences with the “Patients” Forum Medical Ethics’, Bull Med Ethics 135, 18–21.
Reiter-Theil, S. and G. Lenz: 1999, ‘Probleme der Behandlungsbegrenzung im Kontext einer internistischen Intensivstation. Ein kasuistischer Beitrag mit pflegeethischer Perspektive’, Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ethik 45(3), 205–216.
Reiter-Theil, S. and W. Hiddemann: 2000a, ‘Klinische Ethik. Beratung bei Entscheidungsschwierigkeiten’, Deutsches Aerzteblatt 97(14), A-901–903.
Reiter-Theil, S.: 2000b, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the German Society of Oncology (DKG, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft). Berlin, March 2002; Lange D., S. Reiter-Theil and W. Hiddemann (in preparation).
Reiter-Theil, S.: 2003a, ‘Ethics of End-of-life Decisions in the Elderly. Deliberations from the ECOPE Study’, Ballière's Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 17(2), 273–287.
Reiter-Theil, S., S. Traebert, D. Lange and W. Hiddemann: 2003b, ‘Sterben und Sterbehilfe: Problemwahrnehmung von Aerzten und Pflegenden in der Onkologie. Ergebnisse einer Interviewstudie’, Der Onkologe 9, 153–161.
Rubin, B., A. Gratwohl and S. Reiter-Theil: 2003, ‘Stammzellforschung: Ethisches Konflikt-Potential und klinischer Erwartungshorizont’, Der Onkologe 9, 128–139.
Solomon, M.: 1993, ‘Decisions near the End of Life: Professional Views on Life-Sustaining Treatments’, American Journal of Public Health 83, 14–23.
Sugarman, J. and D.P. Sulmasy (eds.): 2001, Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Sulmasy, D.: 2001, ‘Research in Medical Ethics: Physician Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia. Qualitative Methods’, in: J. Sugarman and D.P. Sulmasy (eds.), Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Ten Have, H.: 1994, ‘The Hyperreality of Clinical Ethics: A Unitary Theory and Hermeneutics’, Theoretical Medicine 15, 113–131.
Wuensch, A.: 1999, Medizinethische und Psychologische Probleme bei der Betreuung Sterbender. Eine Problemanalyse. Diplomarbeit in Psychologie an der Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg.
Wuensch, A., D. Lange, J. Bengel, W. Hiddemann and S. Reiter-Theil: 2001, ‘Aerztliche Sterbebegleitung und Passive Sterbehilfe. Eine Empirische Studie zu Ethischen, Medizinischen und Psychologischen Problemen’, Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin 2, 20–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reiter-Theil, S. Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? “The embedded researcher” as a methodological approach. Med Health Care Philos 7, 17–29 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MHEP.0000021846.20508.c8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MHEP.0000021846.20508.c8