Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A physician survey of the effect of drug sample availability on physicians’ behavior

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pharmaceutical companies often use drug samples as a marketing strategy in the ambulatory care setting. Little is known about how the availability of drug samples affects physicians’ prescribing practices. Our goal was to assess: (1) under what circumstances and why physicians dispense drug samples, (2) if drug samples lead physicians to use medications other than their preferred drug choice, and (3) the physician characteristics that are associated with drug sample use.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING: University-based clinics at one academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS: 154 general medicine and family physicians.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physicians’ self-reported prescribing patterns for 3 clinical scenarios, including their preferred drug choice, whether they would use a drug sample and subsequently prescribe the sampled medication, and the importance of factors involved in the decision to dispense a drug sample. A total of 131 (85%) of 154 physicians responded. When presented with an insured woman with an uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection, 22 (17%) respondents reported that they would dispense a drug sample; 21 (95%) of 22 sample users stated that they would dispense a drug sample that differed from their preferred drug choice. For an uninsured man with hypertension, 35 (27%) respondents reported that they would dispense a drug sample; 32 (91%) of 35 sample users indicated that they would dispense a drug sample instead of their preferred drug choice. For an uninsured woman with depression, 108 (82%) respondents reported that they would dispense a drug sample; 53 (49%) of 108 sample users indicated that they would dispense a drug sample that differed from their preferred drug choice. Avoiding cost to the patient was the most consistent motivator for dispensing a drug sample for all 3 scenarios. For 2 scenarios, residents were more likely to report using drug samples than attendings (P<.05). When respondents who chose a drug sample for 2 or 3 scenarios were compared to those who never chose to use a drug sample, or chose a drug sample for only one scenario, only younger age was independently associated with drug sample use.

CONCLUSION: In self-reports, the availability of drug samples led physicians to dispense and subsequently prescribe drugs that differ from their preferred drug choice. Physicians most often report using drug samples to avoid cost to the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avorn J, Chen M, Hartley R. Scientific versus commercial sources of influence on the prescribing behavior of physicians. Am J Med. 1982;73:4–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chren MM, Landefeld CS. Physicians’ behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary. JAMA. 1994;271:684–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Orlowski JP, Wateska L. The effects of pharmaceutical firm enticements on physician prescribing patterns. There’s no such thing as a free lunch. Chest. 1992;102:270–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zuber A. Drug companies aim their sale pitch at physicians. Ask your doctor. New York Times, August 5, 1997; Sect C:1.

  5. Weary PE. Free drug samples: use and abuse. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:135–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Storrs FJ. Drug samples. A conflict of interest? Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:1283–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Debrovner D. Swamped by a sea of samples. American Druggist. October 1994: 29–32.

  8. Erikson SH, Cullison S. Closing the sample closet. Fam Pract Manag. October 1995: 43–7.

  9. Westfall JM, McCabe J, Nicholas RA. Personal use of drug samples by physicians and office staff. JAMA. 1997;278:141–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. STFM Group on Pharmaceutical Industry in Family Medicine. Guidelines for residency program relationships with pharmaceutical and other proprietary companies. Kansas, Mo: Society of Teachers of Family Medicine; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Health Care Organizations. Policies and procedures support safe medication prescription or ordering. (Section Tx 3.3) In: Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals: The Offical Handbook. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 1996;158–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morelli D, Koenigsberg MR. Sample medication dispensing in a residency practice. J Fam Pract. 1992;34:42–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaughnessy AF, Bucci KK. Drug samples and family practice residents. Ann Pharmacother. 1997;31:1296–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The Fifth Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V). Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:154–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. University of Washington Physicians Subcommittee on the Quality Assessment and Improvement Working Group on High Blood Pressure Guidelines: University of Washington Physicians High Blood Pressure Guidelines. Seattle, Wash: University of Washington; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. University of Washington Physicians Subcommittee on the Quality Assessment and Improvement Working Group on Major Depressive Disorder Guidelines: University of Washington Physicians Depression Guidelines. Seattle, Wash: University of Washington; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones TV, Gerrity MS, Earp J. Written case simulations: do they predict physicians’ behavior. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:805–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandvik H. Criterion validity of responses to patient vignettes: an analysis based on management of female urinary incontinence. Fam Med. 1995;27:388–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Soumerai SB, Avorn J. Principles of educational outreach (‘academic detailing’) to improve clinical decision making. JAMA. 1990;263:549–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa D. Chew MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chew, L.D., O’Young, T.S., Hazlet, T.K. et al. A physician survey of the effect of drug sample availability on physicians’ behavior. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 478–483 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.08014.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.08014.x

Key words

Navigation