Abstract
BACKGROUND: The established guidelines for a diabetes foot examination include assessing circulatory, skin, and neurological status to detect problems early and reduce the like-lihood of amputation. Physician adherence to the guidelines for proper examination is less than optimal.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to increase compliance with the performance of a proper foot examination through a predominantly physician-directed interventional campaign.
METHODS: The study consisted of 3 parts: a retrospective chart review to estimate background compliance, an educational intervention, and prospective chart review at 3 and 6 months. A properly documented foot examination was defined as assessing at least 2 of the 3 necessary components. The educational intervention consisted of 2 lectures directed at resident physicians and a quality assurance announcement at a general internal medicine staff meeting. Clinic support staff were instructed to remove the shoes and socks of all diabetic patients when they were placed in exam rooms, and signs remiding diabetics were placed in each exam room.
RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the performance of proper foot examination over the course of the study (baseline 14.0%, 3 months 58.0%, 6 months 62.1%; P<.001). Documentation of any component of a proper foot examination also increased substantially (32.6%, 67.3%, 72.5%; P<.001). Additionally, performance of each component of a proper exam increased dramatically during the study: neurological (13.5%, 35.8%, 38.5%; P<.001), skin (23.0%, 64.2%, 69.2%; P<.001), and vascular (14.0%, 51.2%, 50.5%; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes are unlikely to have foot examinations in their primary medical care. A simple, lowcost educational intervention significantly improved the adherence to foot examination guidelines for patients with diabetes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: National Estimates and General Information on Diabetes in the United States. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1997.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Prevention and Treatment of Complications of Diabetes. A Guide for Primary Care Practitioners. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1991.
Grunfeld C. Diabetic foot ulcers: etiology, treatment, and prevention. Adv Intern Med. 1992;37:103–32.
Levin ME, O’Neal LW, Bowker JH, eds. The Diabetic Foot, 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1993: xxi-xxii.
Levin ME. Foot lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus. In: Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, vol. 25. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1996:447–62.
Smith D, Weinberger M, Katz B. A controlled trial to increase office visits and reduce hospitalizations of diabetic patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1987;2:232–38.
Macleod AF, Williams DRR, Sonksen PH, et al. Risk factors for foot ulceration in hospital clinic attendees. Diabetologia. 1991;34(suppl 2):A39.
Sathe SR. Managing the diabetic foot in developing countries. IDF Bull. 1993;38:16–8.
U.S. Deptartment of Health and Human Services. Diabetes Surveillance: Annual 1990 Report. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control, Division of Diabetes Translation; 1990: 23–25, 93–95.
Reiber GE, Boyko EJ, Smith DG. Lower extremity foot ulcers and amputations in diabetes. In: Diabetes in America, 2nd ed. Bethesda, Md: National Institute of Health; 1995.
American Diabetes Association. Preventive foot care in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(Suppl 1):554–55.
Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Vela SA, Quebedeaux TL, Fleischili JG. Practical criteria for screening patients at high risk for foot ulceration. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:157–62.
McNeely MJ, Bayko EJ, Ahronhi JE, et al. The independent contributions of diabetic neuropathy and vasculopathy in foot ulceration. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:216–9.
Pecoraro RE, Reiber GE, Burgess EM. Pathways to diabetic limb amputation. Basis for prevention. Diabetes Care. 1990;13:513–21.
Edmonds ME. Experience in a multi-disciplinary diabetic foot clinic. In: The Foot in Diabetics. Conor H, Boulton AJM, Ward JD. eds. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley; 1987:121–33.
Laing P. The development and complications of diabetic foot ulcers. Am J Surg. 1998;176(Suppl 1):115–95.
Prevention and Early Intervention for Diabetes Foot Problems. A Research Review. Available at http://ndep.nih.gov/materials/pubs/feet/feet2001.pdf. Accessed February, 2003.
American Diabetes Association. Clinical practice recommendations 2002. Diabetes Care 2002;25(Suppl 1):1–147.
Bild DE, Selby JV, Sinnock P, Browner WS, Braveman P, Showstock JA. Lower extremity amputation in people with diabetes. Epidemiology and prevention. Diabetes Care. 1989;12:24–31.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Survey of Physician Practices Related to the Treatment of People with Diabetes Mellitus. Primary Care Physicians. Rockville Md: Prospect Associates; 1990.
Mazze R, Deeb L, Palumbo PJ. Altering physicians’ practice patterns: a nationwide educational experiment: evaluation of the Clinical Education Program of the American Diabetes Assocaition. Diabetes Care. 1986;9:420–5.
Mayfield JA, Rith-Najarian SJ, Acton KJ, et al. Assessment of diabetes care by medical record review: The Indian Health Service model. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:918–23.
Bloomgarden ZT. Diabetes and managed care. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:1552–54.
Wylie-Rosett J, Walker EA, Shamoon H, Engel S, Basch C, Zybert P. Assessment of documented foot examinations for patients with diabetes in inner-city primary care clinics. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:46–50.
Deeb LC, Pettjohn FP, Shirah JK, Freeman G. Intervention among primary care practitioners to improve care for preventable complications of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1988;11:275–80.
Williams DRR, Munroe C, Hospedales CJ, Greenwood RH. A three-year evaluation of the quality of diabetes care in the Norwich community care scheme. Diabet Med. 1990;7:74–9.
Litzelman DK, Slemenda CW, Langefeld CD, et al. Reduction of lower extremity clinical abnormalities in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:36–41.
Payne TH, Gabella BA, Michael SL, et al. Preventive care in diabetes mellitus: current practices in an urban health care system. Diabetes Care. 1989;12:745–47.
Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center. Diabetes in Communities. Hiss RG, ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1992:1–136.
Cohen SJ. Potential barriers to diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 1983;6:499–500.
Carter WB, Belcher DW, Inui TS. Implementing preventive care in clinical practice. II. Problems for managers, clinicians and patients. Med Care Rev. 1981;38:195–216.
Green LW, Krenter MW. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach. 2nd ed. Mountain View, Calif: Mayfield Publishing Co; 1991.
Bailey TS, Yu HM, Rayfield EJ. Pattern of foot examination in a diabetes clinic. Am J Med. 1985;78:371–74.
Davidson JK, Alogna M, Goldsmith M, Borden J. Assessment of program effectiveness of Grady-Memorial Hospital-Atlanta. In: Steiner G, Lawrence PA. eds. Educating Diabetic Patients. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981:329–48.
Runyan JW Jr. The Memphis Chronic Disease Program. Comparisons in outcome and the nurse’s extended role. JAMA. 1975;231:264–7.
Assal JP, Muhlhauser I, Pernat A, Gfeller R, Jorgens V, Berger M. Patient education as the basis for diabetes care in clinical practice. Diabetologia. 1985;28:602–13.
Reiber GE, Pecoraro RE, Koepsell TD. Risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus: a case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:97–105.
Jackson JL, Strong J, Cheng EY, Meyer G. Patients, diagnoses, and procedures in a military internal medicine clinic: comparison with civilian practices. Mil Med. 1999;164:194–7.
Jackson JL, Cheng EY, Jones DL, Meyer G. Comparison of discharge diagnoses and inpatient procedures between military and civilian health care systems. Mil Med. 1999;164:701–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
No grant support was obtained to perform this study.
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views of the Department of the Air Force or the Department of Defense.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Brien, K.E., Chandramohan, V., Nelson, D.A. et al. Effect of a physician-directed educational campaign on performance of proper diabetic foot exams in an outpatient setting. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 258–265 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10662.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10662.x