Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation and management of osteoporosis following hospitalization for low-impact fracture

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pattern of osteoporosis evaluation and management in postmenopausal women who present with low-impact (minimal trauma) fracture.

DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of patients admitted with a fracture in the absence of trauma or bone disease. Telephone follow-up survey was conducted at 12 months after discharge to collect information on physician visits, pharmacological therapies for osteoporosis, functional status, and subsequent fractures.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women admitted to a hospital in St. Paul, Minnesota between June 1996 and December 1997 for low-impact fractures were identified. Low-impact fracture was defined as a fracture occurring spontaneously or from a fall no greater than standing height. Retrospective review of 301 patient medical records was conducted to obtain data on pre-admission risk factors for osteoporosis and/or fracture, and osteoporosis-related evaluation and management during the course of hospitalization. Follow-up 1 year after the incident fracture was obtained on 227 patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-seven women were included in the study. Osteoporosis was documented in the medical record in 26% (59/227) of the patients at hospital discharge. Within 12 months of hospital discharge, 9.6% (22/227) had a bone mineral density test, and 26.4% (60/227) were prescribed osteoporosis treatment. Of those who were prescribed osteoporosis treatment, 86.6% (52/60) remained on therapy for 1 year. Nineteen women suffered an additional fracture. Compared to women without a prior fracture, women with at least 1 fracture prior to admission were more likely to have osteoporosis diagnosed and to receive osteoporosis-related medications.

CONCLUSION: Despite guidelines that recommend osteoporosis evaluation in adults experiencing a low-trauma fracture, we report that postmenopausal women hospitalized for low-impact fracture were not sufficiently evaluated or treated for osteoporosis during or after their hospital stay. There are substantial opportunities for improvement of care in this high-risk population to prevent subsequent fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone. 1995;7(suppl 5):505–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporosis Fast Facts. Available at: http://www.nof.org/osteoporosis/stats.htm. Accessed September 6, 2000.

  3. Scheiber LB, Torregrosa L. Evaluation and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1998;27:245–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chrischilles E, Shireman T, Wallace R. Costs and health effects of osteoporotic fractures. Bone. 1994;15:377–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barret-Connor E. The economic and human costs of osteoporotic fracture. Am J Med. 1995;98:3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ray NF, Chan JK, Thamer M, Melton LJ III. Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:24–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper C. The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life. Am J Med. 1997;103(2A):12S-17S; discussion 17S–19S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporosis. Review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporosis Int. 1998;8:1S-88S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Melton LJ III, Thamer M, Ray NF, et al. Fractures attributable to osteoporosis: report for the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:16–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freedman KB, Kaplan FS, Bilker WB, Strom BL, Lowe RA. Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1063–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cuddihy M, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, et al. Osteoporosis intervention following distal forearm fractures. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:421–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lydick E, Cook K, Turpin J, Melton M, Stine R, Byrnes C. Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Manag Care. 1998;4:37–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Osteoporosis among estrogen-deficient women—United States, 1988–1994. November 20, 1998;Vol 47; No 45. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/index98.html. Accessed September 12, 2000.

  14. Gallagher TC, Geling O, Comite F. Missed opportunities for prevention of osteoporotic fracture. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:450–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Melton LJ III, Atkinson EJ, Cooper C, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Vertebral fractures predict subsequent fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:214–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Black DM, Arden NK, Palerno L, Pearson J, Cummings SR. Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:821–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Togerson DJ, Campbell MK, Thomas RE, Reid DM. Prediction for perimenopausal fractures by bone mineral density and other risk factors. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:293–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, et al. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:351–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA III, Berger M. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:721–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Simonelli C, Killeen K, Mehle S, Swanson L. Barriers to osteoporosis identification and treatment among primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2002;77:334–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Simonelli MD.

Additional information

Portions of these study results were presented in a poster format at the National Osteoporosis Foundation/International Osteoporosis Foundation meeting, June 2001, Chicago, Ill.

Dr. Simonelli has received research funds and is a consultant to Merck and Company, Eli Lilly, Procter and Gamble, and Novartis. Merck and Company provided statistical support and assistance in manuscript preparation but did not participate in study design or collection of data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simonelli, C., Chen, YT., Morancey, J. et al. Evaluation and management of osteoporosis following hospitalization for low-impact fracture. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 17–22 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20387.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20387.x

Key words

Navigation