Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:39:01.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Approach to the Study of Potentially Preventable Nosocomial Infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

José Rosselló-Urgell*
Affiliation:
Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiologia, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Josep Vaqué-Rafart
Affiliation:
Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiologia, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Eduardo Hermosilla-Pérez
Affiliation:
Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiologia, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Alejandro Allepuz-Palau
Affiliation:
Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiologia, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
EPINE Working Group
Affiliation:
Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiologia, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
*
Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiologia (edificio Escuela de Enfermeras, planta baja), Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, P° Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Objective:

To analyze a method that identifies potentially preventable nosocomial infections, as a tool to evaluate the performance of infection control programs through quantification of their potential for reducing nosocomial infections.

Methods:

The database of the Study of the Prevalence of Nosocomial Infections in Spain (EPINE) was reanalyzed. The method was based on the use of false negatives of the classification table obtained from application of a fixed multiple logistic regression model, as an estimator of the number of potentially preventable nosocomial infections.

Results:

The calculated number of patients with preventable infections was 7,493, which constituted 21.6% of the infected patients. Among hospital areas, intensive care had the lowest preventability rate (4.6%), whereas gynecology and obstetrics had the highest (40.6%). There was a significant inverse exposure-effect relationship between the proportion of preventable infections and the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System risk index. No correlation was observed between the prevalence of patients with nosocomial infection and the percentage of preventable infections.

Conclusion:

This analysis suggests that fewer nosocomial infections may be preventable in Spanish hospitals than previously assumed.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Nosocomial infection rates for interhospital comparison: limitations and possible solutions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:609612.Google Scholar
2.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, Morgan, WM, Emori, TG. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:182205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Vaqué, J, Rosselló, J, Trilla, A, et al.Nosocomial infections in Spain: results of four nationwide seriai prevalence surveys (EPINE Project, 1990-1993). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:293297.Google Scholar
4.Vaqué, J, Rosselló, J, Arribas, JL, EPINE Working Group. Prevalence of nosocomial infections in Spain: EPINE Study 1990-1997. J Hosp Infect 1999;43(suppl):105111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, et al.Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B):152S157S.Google Scholar
6.Kohn, LT, Corrigan, JM, Donaldson, MS, eds. To Err h Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
7.Larson, E, Oram, LF, Hedrick, E. Nosocomial infection rates as an indicator of quality. Med Care 1988;26:676684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Haley, RW. “The hospital epidemiologist” in U.S. hospitals, 1976-1977: a description of the head of the infection surveillance and control program. Infect Control 1980;1:2132.Google Scholar
9.Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Edwards, JR, Culver, DH, Haley, RW. Incidence and nature of endemie and epidemie nosocomial infections. In: Bennett, JV, Brachman, PS, eds. Hospital Infections. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:461476.Google Scholar
10.McGowan, JE Jr, Parrott, PL, Duty, VP. Nosocomial bacteremia: potential for prevention of procedure-related cases. JAMA 1977;237:27272729.Google Scholar
11.Burke, JP, Larsen, RA, Stevens, LE. Nosocomial bacteriuria: estimating the potential for prevention by closed sterile urinary drainage. Infect Control 1986;7:9699.Google Scholar
12.Hayward, RA, Hofer, TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA 2001;286:415420.Google Scholar
13.Gaynes, RP. Surgical-site infections (SSI) and the NNIS basic SSI risk index: Part II. Room for improvement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:266267.Google Scholar
14.Gaynes, RP, Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Edwards, JR, Richards, C, Toison, JS. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992-98: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index. Clin Infec Dis 2001;33:S69S77.Google Scholar
15.Simon, A, Fleischhack, G, Harsan, C, Bode, U, Engelhart, S, Kramer, MH. Surveillance of nosocomial and central-line related infections among pediatrie hematology-oncology patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:592596.Google Scholar
16.Young, LS. Nosocomial infections in the immunocompromised adult. Am J Med 1981;70:398404.Google Scholar