Skip to main content
Log in

Patient safety in the ambulatory setting

A clinician-based approach

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Voluntary reporting of near misses/adverse events is an important but underutilized source of information on errors in medicine. To date, there is very little information on errors in the ambulatory setting and physicians have not traditionally participated actively in their reporting or analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of clinician-based near miss/adverse event voluntary reporting coupled with systems analysis and redesign as a model for continuous quality improvement in the ambulatory setting.

DESIGN: We report the initial 1-year experience of voluntary reporting by clinicians in the ambulatory setting, coupled with root cause analysis and system redesign by a patient safety committee made up of clinicians from the practice.

SETTING: Internal medicine practice site of a large teaching hospital with 25,000 visits per year.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 100 reports in the 1-year period, increased from 5 in the previous year. Faculty physicians reported 44% of the events versus 22% by residents, 31% by nurses, and 3% by managers. Eighty-three percent were near misses and 17% were adverse events. Errors involved medication (47%), lab or x-rays (22%), office administration (21%), and communication (10%) processes. Seventy-two interventions were recommended with 75% implemented during the study period.

CONCLUSION: This model of clinician-based voluntary reporting, systems analysis, and redesign was effective in increasing error reporting, particularly among physicians, and in promoting system changes to improve care and prevent errors. This process can be a powerful tool for incorporating error reporting and analysis into the culture of medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kohn KT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas E, Studdert D, Burstin H, et al. Incidents and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000;38:261–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cullen CJ, Bates DW, Small SD, Cooper JB, Nemenskal AR, Leape LL. The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995;12:541–52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weingart S, Callanan L, Ship A, Aronsen M. A physician-based voluntary reporting system for adverse events and medical errors. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:809–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weingart SN, Ship AN, Aronson MD. Confidential clinician-reported surveillance of adverse events among medical inpatients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:470–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chardhry S, Olfinboba K, Krumholz H. Detection of errors by attending physicians on a general medicine service. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:595–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ACGME Outcome Project Chicago: Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education; 2001. Available at: www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/comphome.asp. Accessed March 30, 2004.

  9. Hammons T, Piland NF, Small SD, Hatlie MJ, Burstin HR. Ambulatory patient safety. What we know and need to know. J Ambul Care Manage. 2003;26:63–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Harrold LR, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA. 2003;289:1107–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gandhi TK, Burstin HR, Cook EF, et al. Drug complications in outpatients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:149–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dovey SM, Meyers DS, Phillips RL, et al. A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:233–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gandhi T, Weingart S, Borus B, et al. Adverse drug events in primary care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1556–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Foster A, Murff H, Peterson J, Gandhi T, Bates D. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:161–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Virginia State Code Statute No. 8.01-581.16 and 581.17.

  16. Battles JB, Shea CE. A system of analyzing medical errors to improve GME curricula and programs. Acad Med. 2001;76:125–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elder NC, Dovey SM. Classification of medical errors and preventable adverse events in primary care: a synthesis of the literature. J Fam Pract. 2002;51:927–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patient Safety and Graduate Medical Education: A Report and Annotated Bibliography by the Joint Committee of the Group on Resident Affairs and Organization of Resident Representatives of the AAMC; February 2003:1–22.

  19. Studdert D, Mello M, Brennan T. Medical malpractice. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:283–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eyes of the reviewer. JAMA. 2001;286:415–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leape LL, Bates DN, Cullen DJ. Systems analyses of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1995;274:35–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6:313–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280:1311–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2741–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chertow GM, Lee J, Kuperman GJ, et al. Guided medication dosing for inpatients with renal insufficiency. JAMA. 2001;286:2839–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Honigman B, Lee J, Rochschild J, et al. Using computerized data to identify adverse drug events in outpatients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:254–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Classen DC, Pestonik SL, Evans RS, Burk JP. Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1991;266:2842–51 (erratum, JAMA. 1992;267:1922).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bates D, Gawande AA. Patient safety: improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2526–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Berwick D. Errors today and errors tomorrow. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2570–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret L. Plews-Ogan MD.

Additional information

Support was received from the Academic Administrative Units in Primary Care for Dr. Schorling; U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration Project Period: September 1, 2000, to August 31, 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plews-Ogan, M.L., Nadkarni, M.M., Forren, S. et al. Patient safety in the ambulatory setting. J GEN INTERN MED 19, 719–725 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30386.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30386.x

Key words

Navigation