Skip to main content
Log in

Computer Calculated Dose in Paediatric Prescribing

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objective: Medication errors are an important cause of hospital-based morbidity and mortality. However, only a few medication error studies have been conducted in children. These have mainly quantified errors in the inpatient setting; there is very little data available on paediatric outpatient and emergency department medication errors and none on discharge medication. This deficiency is of concern because medication errors are more common in children and it has been suggested that the risk of an adverse drug event as a consequence of a medication error is higher in children than in adults.

Objective: The aims of this study were to assess the rate of medication errors in predominantly ambulatory paediatric patients and the effect of computer calculated doses on medication error rates of two commonly prescribed drugs.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study performed in a paediatric unit in a university teaching hospital between March 2003 and August 2003. The hospital’s existing computer clinical decision support system was modified so that doctors could choose the traditional prescription method or the enhanced method of computer calculated dose when prescribing paracetamol (acetaminophen) or promethazine. All prescriptions issued to children (<16 years of age) at the outpatient clinic, emergency department and at discharge from the inpatient service were analysed. A medication error was defined as to have occurred if there was an underdose (below the agreed value), an overdose (above the agreed value), no frequency of administration specified, no dose given or excessive total daily dose. The medication error rates and the factors influencing medication error rates were determined using SPSS version 12.

Results: From March to August 2003, 4281 prescriptions were issued. Seven prescriptions (0.16%) were excluded, hence 4274 prescriptions were analysed. Most prescriptions were issued by paediatricians (including neonatologists and paediatric surgeons) and/or junior doctors. The error rate in the children’s emergency department was 15.7%, for outpatients was 21.5% and for discharge medication was 23.6%. Most errors were the result of an underdose (64%; 536/833). The computer calculated dose error rate was 12.6% compared with the traditional prescription error rate of 28.2%. Logistical regression analysis showed that computer calculated dose was an important and independent variable influencing the error rate (adjusted relative risk = 0.436, 95% CI 0.336, 0.520, p < 0.001). Other important independent variables were seniority and paediatric training of the person prescribing and the type of drug prescribed.

Conclusions: Medication error, especially underdose, is common in outpatient, emergency department and discharge prescriptions. Computer calculated doses can significantly reduce errors, but other risk factors have to be concurrently addressed to achieve maximum benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003 Jun; 163(12): 1409–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaushal R, Bates DW, Landrigan C, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA 2001 Apr; 285(16): 2114–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber ND, Batty R, Ridout DA. Predicting the rate of physician-accepted interventions by hospital pharmacists in the United Kingdom. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1997 Feb; 54(4): 397–405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Levine SR, Cohen MR, Blanchard NR, et al. Guidelines for preventing medication errors in pediatrics. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2001; 6: 426–42

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fortescue EB, Kaushal R, Landrigan CP, et al. Prioritizing strategies for preventing medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1): 722–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rowe C, Koren T, Koren G. Errors by paediatric residents in calculating drug doses. Arch Dis Child 1998 Jul; 79(1): 56–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Glover ML, Sussmane JB. Assessing pediatrics residents’ mathematical skills for prescribing medication: a need for improved training. Acad Med 2002 Oct; 77(10): 1007–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Folli HL, Poole RL, Benitz WE, et al. Medication error prevention by clinical pharmacists in two children’s hospitals. Pediatrics 1987 May; 79(5): 718–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA 1998 Oct; 280(15): 1311–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Walton RT, Harvey E, Dovey S, et al. Computerised advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice (Cochrane Review). Available in The Cochrane Library (database on disk and CD ROM). Updated quarterly. The Cochrane Collaboration; issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, et al. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 1998 Oct; 280(15): 1339–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mullett CJ, Evans RS, Christenson JC, et al. Development and impact of a computerized pediatric antiinfective decision support program [abstract]. Pediatrics 2001 Oct; 108(4): E75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Knaup P, Wiedemann T, Bachert A, et al. Efficiency and safety of chemotherapy plans for children: CATIPO: a nationwide approach. Artif Intell Med 2002 Mar; 24(3): 229–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kozer E, Scolnik D, Macpherson A, et al. Variables associated with medication errors in pediatric emergency medicine. Pediatrics 2002 Oct; 110(4): 737–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Phillips DP, Christenfeld N, Glynn LM. Increase in US medication-error deaths between 1983 and 1993. Lancet 1998 Feb; 351(9103): 643–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Walson PD, Martin R, Endow E, et al. Prescription writing in a pediatric clinic. Pediatr Pharmacol (New York ) 1981; 1(3): 239–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Selbst SM, Fein JA, Osterhoudt K, et al. Medication errors in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 1999 Feb; 15(1): 1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaushal R, Barker KN, Bates DW. How can information technology improve patient safety and reduce medication errors in children’s health care? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001 Sep; 155(9): 1002–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marino BL, Reinhardt K, Eichelberger WJ, et al. Prevalence of errors in a pediatric hospital medication system: implications for error proofing. Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract 2000 Jul; 4(3): 129–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med 2003 Apr; 348(16): 1556–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. This research work was not funded by any funding agency. Ethics board approval was not required for this research work.

J Packia, HM Kam, B Ong and RC Kirk designed the computer program and assisted in data collection. RC Kirk and DL Goh collated the data and performed the statistical analysis. All authors contributed to the writing or editing of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise Li-Meng Goh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirk, R.C., Goh, D.LM., Packia, J. et al. Computer Calculated Dose in Paediatric Prescribing. Drug-Safety 28, 817–824 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200528090-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200528090-00006

Keywords

Navigation