Abstract
Community pharmacists are potentially in a strong position to contribute to improved patient care by providing medicines management services. Several major trials of community pharmacy medicines management (CPMM) have been conducted in Europe, North America, and Australia. Their findings show that some, but not all, of the potential of CPMM is being met, and thus far, evidence of benefit from CPMM is equivocal. There is a need to review the appropriateness of some of the primary outcome measures used in research to date. Key factors in pharmacy practice that impede CPMM include insufficient integration of community pharmacy input into patient pathways through treatment, poorly developed relationships between pharmacists and primary care physicians, lack of access to patient information, inadequate methods for targetting services to patients with identified medication-related problems, and community pharmacists’ willingness (or lack thereof) to provide the service. Recommendations as to how to improve CPMM services so that they deliver their full potential include integrating work practices with medical colleagues, targeting of patients, providing pharmacist access to patients’ medical records, and improving communication with patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Prescribing Centre. Medicines management services: why are they so important? MeReC Bull 2002; 12(6): 1–3 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.npc.co.uk/MeReC_Bulletins/2001Volumes/pdfs/vo112no6.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]
Cochrane Collaboration [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cochrane.org/ [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]
National Institute of Clinical Excellence [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/ [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [online]. Available from URL: http://www.sign.ac.uk/ [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]
Scottish Medicines Consortium [online]. Available from URL: http://www.scottishmedicines.org.uk/smc/CCC_FirstPage.jsp [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]
National Prescribing Service of Australia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nps.org.au/ [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]
Management of medicines: A resource to support implementation of the wider aspects of medicines management for the national service frameworks for diabetes, renal services and long-term conditions. London: Department of Health, 2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4088754 [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]
Farrall P, Pye I. What PCTs have achieved with the Medicines Management Services Collaborative. Prescr Med Manage 2005 Jun; PM2 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.pjonline.com/MedicinesManagement/editorial/200506/features/p02collaborative.html [Accessed 2007 Dec 24]
Home Medicines Review (HMR). Medicare Australia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/provider/pbs/fourth-agreement/hmr.shtml [Accessed 2008 Jan 31]
Committee of Inquiry. Pharmacy: a report to the Nuffield Foundation. London: The Nuffield Foundation, 1986
Bond C, Matheson C, Williams P, et al. Repeat dispensing: a role for community pharmacists in controlling and monitoring repeat prescriptions. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 271–5
Jesson J, Pocock R, Wilson K. Reducing medicines waste in the community. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2005; 6: 117–214
Chrischilles EA, Carter BL, Lund BC, et al. Evaluation of the Iowa Medicaid pharmaceutical case management program. J Am Pharm Assoc 2004; 44(3): 337–49
Krass I, Smith C. Impact of medication regimen reviews performed by community pharmacists for ambulatory patients through liaison with general medical practitioners. Int J Pharm Pract 2000; 8: 111–20
Sorensen L, Stokes JA, Purdie DM, et al. Medication reviews in the community: results of a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 224(58): 648–64
Pharmacy Guild of Australia. Evaluation of the home medicines review programme. 2005 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.guild.org.au/uploadedfiles/Medication_Management_Reviews/Overview/Urbis%20Keys% 20Young%20evaluation.pdf [Accessed 2007 Dec 18]
The Community Pharmacy Medicines Management Evaluation Project Team. The MEDMAN study: a randomized controlled trial of community pharmacy-led medicines management for patients with coronary heart disease. Fam Pract 2007; 24(2): 189–200
Holland R, Lenaghan E, Smith R, et al. Does home based medication review keep older people out of hospital? The HOMER randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005 Feb; 330: 293
UK study fails to show benefit of medication reviews. Pharm J 2007; 279: 147 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.pjonline.com/Editorial/20070811/news/p147medicationreviews.html [Accessed 2008 Mar 18]
Holland R, Brooksby I, Lenaghan E, et al. Effectiveness of visits from community pharmacists for patients with heart failure: HeartMed randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007 May; 334: 1098–100
Tinelli M, Bond C, Blenkinsopp A. Patients evaluation of a community pharmacy medications management service: focus on attitudes, expectations and satisfaction. Ann Pharmacother 2007; 41: 1962–70
Krska J, Rowe P. Can pharmacist medication reviews ever have an impact on hospital admissions?. Proceedings of the 13th Health Services Research and Pharmacy Practice Conference; 2007 Apr 2–3; Staffordshire [online]. Available from URL: http://www.hsrpp.org.uk/VolAbstracts.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]
Petty D, Zermansky AG, Raynor DK, et al. Clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly patients on repeat medications in general practice: pharmacist interventions and review outcomes. Int J Pharm Pract 2002; 10: 39–46
Zermansky A, Alldred DP, Petty D, et al. Clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly people living in care homes: randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 2006; 35: 586–91
Pharmacist independent prescribing. London: Department of Health, 2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Policyandguidance/Medicinespharmacyandindustry/Prescriptions/TheNon-MedicalPrescribingProgramme/Independentpharmacistprescribing/index.htm [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]
McLean WM, MacKeigan L. When does pharmaceutical care impact health outcomes? A comparison of community pharmacy-based studies of pharmaceutical care for patients with asthma. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39(4): 625–31
Zermansky AG, Petty DR, Raynor DK, et al. Randomised controlled trial of clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly patients receiving repeat prescriptions in general practice. BMJ 2001; 323: 1340–3
Krska J, Cromarty JA, Arris F, et al. Pharmacist-led medication review in patients over 65: a randomised, controlled trial in primary care. Age Ageing 2001; 30: 215–21
Roberts A, Benrimoj S, Chen T, et al. Understanding practice change in community pharmacy: a qualitative study in Australia. Res Social Adm Pharm 2005; 1(4): 546–64
Salter C, Holland R, Harvey I, et al. “I haven’t even phoned my doctor yet”. The advice giving role of the pharmacist during consultations for medication review with patients aged 80 or more: qualitative discourse analysis. BMJ 2007; 334: 1101–4
Stewart D, George J, Harkness S, et al. Development and validation of a tool for evaluating consultation skills of non-medical prescribers [abstract]. Int J Pharm Pract 2007; 15 Suppl. 2: B28
American Pharmacists Association and National Association of Chain Drug Stores Foundation. Medication therapy management in community pharmacy practice: core elements of an MTM service. J Am Pharm Assoc 2005; 45(5): 573–9
Acknowledgments
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. Professors Blenkinsopp and Bond have previously received research grants from the British Department of Health for the conduct of the MedMan trial of community pharmacy medicines management.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blenkinsopp, A., Bond, C.M. The Potential and Pitfalls of Medicine Management. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 16, 79–86 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200816020-00002
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200816020-00002