Skip to main content
Log in

The Potential and Pitfalls of Medicine Management

What Have We Learned So Far?

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Disease Management & Health Outcomes

Abstract

Community pharmacists are potentially in a strong position to contribute to improved patient care by providing medicines management services. Several major trials of community pharmacy medicines management (CPMM) have been conducted in Europe, North America, and Australia. Their findings show that some, but not all, of the potential of CPMM is being met, and thus far, evidence of benefit from CPMM is equivocal. There is a need to review the appropriateness of some of the primary outcome measures used in research to date. Key factors in pharmacy practice that impede CPMM include insufficient integration of community pharmacy input into patient pathways through treatment, poorly developed relationships between pharmacists and primary care physicians, lack of access to patient information, inadequate methods for targetting services to patients with identified medication-related problems, and community pharmacists’ willingness (or lack thereof) to provide the service. Recommendations as to how to improve CPMM services so that they deliver their full potential include integrating work practices with medical colleagues, targeting of patients, providing pharmacist access to patients’ medical records, and improving communication with patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Prescribing Centre. Medicines management services: why are they so important? MeReC Bull 2002; 12(6): 1–3 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.npc.co.uk/MeReC_Bulletins/2001Volumes/pdfs/vo112no6.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cochrane Collaboration [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cochrane.org/ [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]

  3. National Institute of Clinical Excellence [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/ [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]

  4. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [online]. Available from URL: http://www.sign.ac.uk/ [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]

  5. Scottish Medicines Consortium [online]. Available from URL: http://www.scottishmedicines.org.uk/smc/CCC_FirstPage.jsp [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]

  6. National Prescribing Service of Australia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nps.org.au/ [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]

  7. Management of medicines: A resource to support implementation of the wider aspects of medicines management for the national service frameworks for diabetes, renal services and long-term conditions. London: Department of Health, 2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4088754 [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farrall P, Pye I. What PCTs have achieved with the Medicines Management Services Collaborative. Prescr Med Manage 2005 Jun; PM2 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.pjonline.com/MedicinesManagement/editorial/200506/features/p02collaborative.html [Accessed 2007 Dec 24]

  9. Home Medicines Review (HMR). Medicare Australia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/provider/pbs/fourth-agreement/hmr.shtml [Accessed 2008 Jan 31]

  10. Committee of Inquiry. Pharmacy: a report to the Nuffield Foundation. London: The Nuffield Foundation, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bond C, Matheson C, Williams P, et al. Repeat dispensing: a role for community pharmacists in controlling and monitoring repeat prescriptions. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 271–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jesson J, Pocock R, Wilson K. Reducing medicines waste in the community. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2005; 6: 117–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chrischilles EA, Carter BL, Lund BC, et al. Evaluation of the Iowa Medicaid pharmaceutical case management program. J Am Pharm Assoc 2004; 44(3): 337–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krass I, Smith C. Impact of medication regimen reviews performed by community pharmacists for ambulatory patients through liaison with general medical practitioners. Int J Pharm Pract 2000; 8: 111–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sorensen L, Stokes JA, Purdie DM, et al. Medication reviews in the community: results of a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 224(58): 648–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pharmacy Guild of Australia. Evaluation of the home medicines review programme. 2005 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.guild.org.au/uploadedfiles/Medication_Management_Reviews/Overview/Urbis%20Keys% 20Young%20evaluation.pdf [Accessed 2007 Dec 18]

  17. The Community Pharmacy Medicines Management Evaluation Project Team. The MEDMAN study: a randomized controlled trial of community pharmacy-led medicines management for patients with coronary heart disease. Fam Pract 2007; 24(2): 189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Holland R, Lenaghan E, Smith R, et al. Does home based medication review keep older people out of hospital? The HOMER randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005 Feb; 330: 293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. UK study fails to show benefit of medication reviews. Pharm J 2007; 279: 147 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.pjonline.com/Editorial/20070811/news/p147medicationreviews.html [Accessed 2008 Mar 18]

    Google Scholar 

  20. Holland R, Brooksby I, Lenaghan E, et al. Effectiveness of visits from community pharmacists for patients with heart failure: HeartMed randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007 May; 334: 1098–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tinelli M, Bond C, Blenkinsopp A. Patients evaluation of a community pharmacy medications management service: focus on attitudes, expectations and satisfaction. Ann Pharmacother 2007; 41: 1962–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krska J, Rowe P. Can pharmacist medication reviews ever have an impact on hospital admissions?. Proceedings of the 13th Health Services Research and Pharmacy Practice Conference; 2007 Apr 2–3; Staffordshire [online]. Available from URL: http://www.hsrpp.org.uk/VolAbstracts.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]

  23. Petty D, Zermansky AG, Raynor DK, et al. Clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly patients on repeat medications in general practice: pharmacist interventions and review outcomes. Int J Pharm Pract 2002; 10: 39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zermansky A, Alldred DP, Petty D, et al. Clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly people living in care homes: randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 2006; 35: 586–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pharmacist independent prescribing. London: Department of Health, 2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Policyandguidance/Medicinespharmacyandindustry/Prescriptions/TheNon-MedicalPrescribingProgramme/Independentpharmacistprescribing/index.htm [Accessed 2008 Jan 18]

  26. McLean WM, MacKeigan L. When does pharmaceutical care impact health outcomes? A comparison of community pharmacy-based studies of pharmaceutical care for patients with asthma. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39(4): 625–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zermansky AG, Petty DR, Raynor DK, et al. Randomised controlled trial of clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly patients receiving repeat prescriptions in general practice. BMJ 2001; 323: 1340–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Krska J, Cromarty JA, Arris F, et al. Pharmacist-led medication review in patients over 65: a randomised, controlled trial in primary care. Age Ageing 2001; 30: 215–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roberts A, Benrimoj S, Chen T, et al. Understanding practice change in community pharmacy: a qualitative study in Australia. Res Social Adm Pharm 2005; 1(4): 546–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Salter C, Holland R, Harvey I, et al. “I haven’t even phoned my doctor yet”. The advice giving role of the pharmacist during consultations for medication review with patients aged 80 or more: qualitative discourse analysis. BMJ 2007; 334: 1101–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stewart D, George J, Harkness S, et al. Development and validation of a tool for evaluating consultation skills of non-medical prescribers [abstract]. Int J Pharm Pract 2007; 15 Suppl. 2: B28

    Google Scholar 

  32. American Pharmacists Association and National Association of Chain Drug Stores Foundation. Medication therapy management in community pharmacy practice: core elements of an MTM service. J Am Pharm Assoc 2005; 45(5): 573–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. Professors Blenkinsopp and Bond have previously received research grants from the British Department of Health for the conduct of the MedMan trial of community pharmacy medicines management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Blenkinsopp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blenkinsopp, A., Bond, C.M. The Potential and Pitfalls of Medicine Management. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 16, 79–86 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200816020-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200816020-00002

Keywords

Navigation