Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T20:22:11.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bland Soap Handwash or Hand Antisepsis? The Pressing Need for Clarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

N. Joel Ehrenkranz*
Affiliation:
Florida Consortium for Infection Control, South Miami, Florida
*
Florida Consortium for Infection Control, 5901 S.W. 74th Street, Suite 300, South Miami, FL 33143

Extract

A pervasive misconception in infection control circles is that simple bland soap handwash reliably prevents hand transmission of transiently acquired bacteria, disregarding the level of hand contamination. Often cited to support this widespread misapprehension is a bigger misconception-the efficacy of bland soap handwash is rooted in the epidemiological research of Ignaz Semmelweis. As emphasized by Walter and Beck, Semmelweis did no such thing. Indeed, it was the observation by Semmelweis of failure of bland soap handwash to prevent healthcare workers from spreading puerperal sepsis that led to his investigations of chlorine hand antisepsis for control of cross-infection. These studies ultimately resulted in his demonstrating that effective hand antisepsis (and not bland soap handwash) could prevent transmission of the agents of postpartum endometritis, sepsis, and death.

Type
Departments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Walter, CW. Disinfection of hands. Am J Surg. 1965;106:691693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Walter, CW. Handwashing and Semmelweis. Ann Intern Med. 1976;85:398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Beck, WC. Handwashing, Semmelweis, and chlorine. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988;9:366367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Semmelweis, IP (translated by Murphy RD). The etiology, the concept, and the prophylaxis of childbed fever. Medical Classics. 1941;5:719773.Google Scholar
5. Steere, AC, Mallison, GE Reply to CW Walter. Ann Intern Med. 1976;85:398.Google Scholar
6. Graham, DR, Anderson, RL, Ariel, FE, et al. Epidemic nosocomial meningitis due to Citrobacter diversus in neonates. J Infect Dis. 1981;144:203209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Williams, WW, Mariano, JM, Spurrier, M, et al. Nosocomial meningitis due to Citrobacter diversus in neonates. New aspects of the epidemiology. J Infect Dis. 1984;150:220235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Lowbury, EJL, Lilly, HA, Bull, JP. Disinfection of hands: removal of transient organisms. Br Med J. 1964;ii:230233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ayliffe, GAS, Babb, JR, Lilly, HA. Hand disinfection: a comparison of various agents in laboratory and ward studies. J Hosp Infect. 1988;11:226243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Rotter, M. Are models useful for testing hand antiseptics? ] Hosp Infect. 1988;11(suppl A):236243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Newson, SWB, Rowland, C. Application of the hygenic hand-disinfection test to the gloved hand. J Hosp Infect. 1989;14:245247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Eckert, DG, Ehrenkranz, NJ, Alfonso, BC. Indications for alcohol or bland soap in removal of aerobic gram-negative skin bacteria: assessment by a novel method. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989;10:306311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Marples, RR, Towers, AG. A laboratory model for the investigation of contact transfer of micro-organisms, J Hyg Camb. 1979;82:237248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Ehrenkranz, NJ, Alfonso, BC. Failure of handwashing to prevent hand transfer of patient bacteria to urethral catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:654662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Bradley, C, Babb, J, Davies, J, Ayliffe, G. Taking precautions. Nursing Times. 1986; March 5:7073.Google Scholar
16. Ojajarvi, J. Effectiveness of handwashing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing. J Hyg Camb. 1980;85:193293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. McFarland, LV, Mulligan, ME, Kwok, RYY, Stamm, WE. Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile . N Engl J Med. 1989;320:204210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Ehrenkranz, NJ, Sanders, CC, Schollenberger, DE, et al. Lack of evidence of efficacy of cohorting nursing personnel in a neonatal intensive care unit to prevent contact spread of bacteria: an experimental study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992;11:105113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Maki, DG. Hennekens, CH, Bennett, JV. Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. JAMA. 1972;221:12701271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Brun-Buisson, C, Legrand, P, Rauss, A, et al. Intestinal decontamination for control of nosocomial multiresistant gram-negative bacilli. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:873881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Doebbling, BN, Pfaller, MA, Houston, AK, Wenzel, RP. Removal of nosocomial pathogens from the contaminated glove: implications for glove reuse and handwashing. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:394398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Patterson, JE, et al. Association of contaminated gloves with transmission of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and A anitratus in an intensive care unit. Am J Med. 1991;91:479483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Maki, DG, McCormick, RD, Zilz, MA, Stalz, SM, Alvarado, CJ. An MRSA outbreak in an intensive care unit during universal precautions. Presented at the 30th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; October 21-24, 1990; Atlanta, Ga.Google Scholar
24. Stringer, B, Smith, JA. Scharf, S, Valentine, A, Walker, MM. A study of the use of gloves in a large teaching hospital. Am J Infect Control. 1991;19:233236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Kaczmarek, RG, Moore, RM, McCrohan, J, et al. Glove use by healthcare workers: results of a tristate investigation. Am J Infect Control. 1991;19:228232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Reybrouck, G. Handwashing and hand disinfection. J Hosp Infect. 1986;8:523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed