Final year medical students' views on simulation-based teaching: a comparison with the Best Evidence Medical Education Systematic Review

Med Teach. 2010;32(7):569-77. doi: 10.3109/01421590903544710.

Abstract

Background: Simulation is being increasingly used in medical education.

Aim: The aim of this study was to explore in more depth the features of simulation-based teaching that undergraduate medical students value using the Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) Systematic Review features that lead to effective learning as a framework.

Method: Thematic analysis of four semi-structured focus groups with final year medical students who had been taught acute care skills using a medium-fidelity whole-body simulator manikin (SimMan).

Results: Twelve key themes were identified, namely, feedback, integration into curriculum, learning style, learning environment, realism, teamwork, communication skills, confidence/increased self-efficacy, anxiety, performance, perceptions of foundation year 1 (FY1) and SimMan as a resource. Each theme is described with supporting quotes.

Conclusion: Six of the ten features listed in the BEME review appeared to be of particular value to the medical students. This study provides a richer understanding of these features. In addition, new insights into the effect of simulation on confidence, anxiety and self-efficacy are discussed which may be affected by the 'performance' nature of simulation role-play. Students also contribute critical thought about the use of SimMan as a resource and provide novel ideas for reducing 'downtime'.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Computer Simulation*
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate* / methods
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate* / standards
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate* / trends
  • Emergency Medicine* / education
  • Emergency Medicine* / methods
  • Evidence-Based Medicine* / education
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Manikins
  • Qualitative Research
  • Students, Medical* / psychology
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic
  • United Kingdom